Think Once, Think Again: Exploring the Harm-Made Mind Effect Through Dual-Process Theory

Abstract This paper presents results from a pre-registered online experiment ( N = 317) on the harm-made mind phenomenon (i.e., people’s tendency to perceive mind in seemingly mindless agents, such as robots, when they are harmed). To address inconsistent findings on this phenomenon, we study the harm-made mind through a dual-processing perspective. We propose that the harm-made mind of a robot is (a) positively mediated by perceived capacity for pain and (b) negatively mediated by objectifying dehumanization. By manipulating information processing, we explore how different processing types (Type 1 vs. Type 2) impact the mediation of the harm-made mind through perceived capacity for pain and dehumanization. The results of the online experiment showed that when people gave rapid answers under cognitive load (i.e., when Type 1 processing was encouraged), watching a harmful interaction with a robot (compared to a no-harm condition) resulted in (a) a positive indirect effect on mind perception through perceived capacity for pain and (b) a positive rather than the assumed negative indirect effect on mind perception through a decrease in dehumanization. While the mediation effect of harm on mind perception through perceived capacity for pain was significant across processing types, the mediation effect of harm on mind perception through dehumanization was no longer significant when people were asked to deliberate on their answers (i.e., when Type 2 thinking was encouraged).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Robotics
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01179-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Think Once, Think Again: Exploring the Harm-Made Mind Effect Through Dual-Process Theory

Kevin Koban, Marieke S. Wieringa
1 citations
International Journal of Social Robotics
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.34
article

Think Once, Think Again: Exploring the Harm-Made Mind Effect Through Dual-Process Theory

Kevin Koban, Marieke S. Wieringa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents results from a pre-registered online experiment ( N = 317) on the harm-made mind phenomenon (i.e., people’s tendency to perceive mind in seemingly mindless agents, such as robots, when they are harmed). To address inconsistent findings on this phenomenon, we study the harm-made mind through a dual-processing perspective. We propose that the harm-made mind of a robot is (a) positively mediated by perceived capacity for pain and (b) negatively mediated by objectifying dehumanization. By manipulating information processing, we explore how different processing types (Type 1 vs. Type 2) impact the mediation of the harm-made mind through perceived capacity for pain and dehumanization. The results of the online experiment showed that when people gave rapid answers under cognitive load (i.e., when Type 1 processing was encouraged), watching a harmful interaction with a robot (compared to a no-harm condition) resulted in (a) a positive indirect effect on mind perception through perceived capacity for pain and (b) a positive rather than the assumed negative indirect effect on mind perception through a decrease in dehumanization. While the mediation effect of harm on mind perception through perceived capacity for pain was significant across processing types, the mediation effect of harm on mind perception through dehumanization was no longer significant when people were asked to deliberate on their answers (i.e., when Type 2 thinking was encouraged).

International Journal of Social RoboticsVol. 16(11-12)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Groningen (NL)
Universität Wien
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.