Patient Preferences Concerning Humanoid Features in Healthcare Robots

In this paper, I argue that patient preferences concerning human physical attributes associated with race, culture, and gender should be excluded from public healthcare robot design. On one hand, healthcare should be (objective, universal) needs oriented. On the other hand, patient well-being (the aim of healthcare) is, in concrete ways, tied to preferences, as is patient satisfaction (a core WHO value). The shift toward patient-centered healthcare places patient preferences into the spotlight. Accordingly, the design of healthcare technology cannot simply disregard patient preferences, even those which are potentially morally problematic. A method for handling these at the design level is thus imperative. By way of uncontroversial starting points, I argue that the priority of the public healthcare system is the fulfillment of patients' therapeutic needs, among which certain potentially morally problematic preferences may be counted. There are further ethical considerations, however, which, taken together, suggest that the potential benefits of upholding these preferences are outweighed by the potential harms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Engineering Ethics
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00508-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Preferences Concerning Humanoid Features in Healthcare Robots

Dane Leigh Gogoshin
2 citations
Science and Engineering Ethics
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
0.69
article

Patient Preferences Concerning Humanoid Features in Healthcare Robots

Dane Leigh Gogoshin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that patient preferences concerning human physical attributes associated with race, culture, and gender should be excluded from public healthcare robot design. On one hand, healthcare should be (objective, universal) needs oriented. On the other hand, patient well-being (the aim of healthcare) is, in concrete ways, tied to preferences, as is patient satisfaction (a core WHO value). The shift toward patient-centered healthcare places patient preferences into the spotlight. Accordingly, the design of healthcare technology cannot simply disregard patient preferences, even those which are potentially morally problematic. A method for handling these at the design level is thus imperative. By way of uncontroversial starting points, I argue that the priority of the public healthcare system is the fulfillment of patients' therapeutic needs, among which certain potentially morally problematic preferences may be counted. There are further ethical considerations, however, which, taken together, suggest that the potential benefits of upholding these preferences are outweighed by the potential harms.

Science and Engineering EthicsVol. 30(6)
University of Helsinki (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri, Koneen Säätiö
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patient Preferences Concerning Humanoid Features in Healthcare Robots — Dane Leigh Gogoshin · Science and Engineering Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS