Evolving Practice and Outcomes in Grade 2 Glioma: Real-World Data from a Multi-Institutional Registry
<b>Background</b>: Grade-2 gliomas (G2-glioma) are uncommon. In 2016, RTOG9802 established the addition of chemotherapy after radiation (CRT) as a new standard of care for patients with high-risk G2-glioma, defined as subtotal resection or age ≥40 yrs. Here, we report current practices using real-world data. <b>Methods</b>: Patients diagnosed with G2-glioma from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2022 were identified in BRAIN, a prospective clinical registry collecting data on patients with brain tumours. High- and low-risk were defined as per RTOG9802. Two time periods, January 2016-December 2019 (TP1) and January 2020-December 2022 (TP2), were defined. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. <b>Results</b>: 224 patients were identified. Overall, 38 (17%) were low-risk, with 35 (91%) observed without further treatment. A total of 186 (83%) were high-risk, with 96 (52%) observed, 63 (34%) receiving CRT, and 19 (10%) receiving radiation. Over time, CRT use increased (TP1 vs. TP2: 22% vs. 36%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and the rate of biopsy (TP1 vs. TP2: 35% vs. 20%, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and radiotherapy alone (TP1 vs. TP2: 14% vs. 4%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) decreased. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in high-risk patients who received CRT (NR) over observation (39 months) (HR 0.49, <i>p</i> = 0.007). In high-risk patients who were observed, 59 (61%) were progression-free at 12 months and 10 (10%) at 5 years. OS data remains immature. <b>Conclusions</b>: Congruent with RTOG9802, real-world BRAIN data shows CRT is associated with improved PFS compared to observation in high-risk G2-glioma. Whilst CRT use has increased over time, observation after surgery remains the most common strategy, with some high-risk patients achieving clinically meaningful PFS. Validated biomarkers are urgently required to better inform patient management.
Authors
- Ronnie J. Freilich
- Lucy Gately (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3003-3175)
- Rosemary Anne Harrup (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9770-2791)
- Ian Collins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-0942)
- Katharine J. Drummond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8152-2120)
- Claire Phillips (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7215-8729)
- Elizabeth Ahern (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-5695)
- Peter Gibbs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1423-4484)
- Anthony Dowling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-9518)
- Grace Y. Kim
- Iwan Bennett
- M. Dumas
- Robert M. Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2120-6887)
- David Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-2159)
- S.G. Reeves
Institutions
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Barwon Health (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- Geelong Hospital (AU)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- The Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
- Cabrini Hospital (AU)
- Ballarat Health Services (AU)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Bendigo Health (AU)
- Alfred Health (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cancers
- Published
- 2024-10-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16203514
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.88