Temperature Margin Calculation During Finite Element Creep Simulations

Abstract Creep deformation in turbomachinery applications is a highly nonlinear phenomenon where ±15 °C may halve or double the average rupture life. Even in well-controlled laboratory conditions, this stochastic nature means that identical tests may differ by a factor of two. Analysts using implicit finite element user creep subroutines may not appreciate the uncertainty of their solution, or the design changes required to account for uncertainty in either the boundary conditions or the solution itself. Designing to a maximum strain limit does not consider the sudden acceleration of tertiary creep rates. Applying a time factor may extend the simulation time by multiple factors. This paper presents a methodology where two estimations of creep damage are made in parallel to the creep simulation at actual operating temperatures. These two estimations consider the predicted change in stress relaxation, at higher or lower temperatures, to estimate the temperature change required to reach the onset of creep, at any given node in the model, and at any given time in the analysis. This margin calculation is expanded to consider the uncertainty in creep prediction. A time-based scatter factor is incorporated into the temperature margin calculation to provide a minimum temperature margin that includes model uncertainty. The analyst can also consider the uncertainty of the temperature prediction and boundary conditions to produce a robust creep prediction in a real-world simulation. The methodology is validated through the finite element analysis (FEA) of example cases and applied to a creep-limited second stage turbine blade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066896
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Forming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temperature Margin Calculation During Finite Element Creep Simulations

Ali P. Gordon, W. David Day, Nathan O’Nora
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Metallurgy and Material Forming
article

Temperature Margin Calculation During Finite Element Creep Simulations

Ali P. Gordon, W. David Day, Nathan O’Nora
article en

Abstract

Abstract Creep deformation in turbomachinery applications is a highly nonlinear phenomenon where ±15 °C may halve or double the average rupture life. Even in well-controlled laboratory conditions, this stochastic nature means that identical tests may differ by a factor of two. Analysts using implicit finite element user creep subroutines may not appreciate the uncertainty of their solution, or the design changes required to account for uncertainty in either the boundary conditions or the solution itself. Designing to a maximum strain limit does not consider the sudden acceleration of tertiary creep rates. Applying a time factor may extend the simulation time by multiple factors. This paper presents a methodology where two estimations of creep damage are made in parallel to the creep simulation at actual operating temperatures. These two estimations consider the predicted change in stress relaxation, at higher or lower temperatures, to estimate the temperature change required to reach the onset of creep, at any given node in the model, and at any given time in the analysis. This margin calculation is expanded to consider the uncertainty in creep prediction. A time-based scatter factor is incorporated into the temperature margin calculation to provide a minimum temperature margin that includes model uncertainty. The analyst can also consider the uncertainty of the temperature prediction and boundary conditions to produce a robust creep prediction in a real-world simulation. The methodology is validated through the finite element analysis (FEA) of example cases and applied to a creep-limited second stage turbine blade.

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerVol. 147(5)
University of Central Florida (US), Jupiter Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Metallurgy and Material Forming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Temperature Margin Calculation During Finite Element Creep Simulations — Ali P. Gordon, W. David Day, et al. · Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS