Boosted four-top production at the LHC: A window to Randall-Sundrum or extended color symmetry

Scenarios seeking to address the issue of electroweak symmetry breaking often have heavy colored gauge bosons coupling preferentially to the top quark. Considering the bulk Randall-Sundrum as a typical example, we consider the prospects of the first Kaluza-Klein mode (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msup><a:mi>G</a:mi><a:mrow><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>1</a:mn><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msup></a:math>) of the gluon being produced at the LHC in association with a <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>t</e:mi><e:mover accent="true"><e:mi>t</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">¯</e:mo></e:mover></e:math> pair. The enhanced coupling not only dictates that the dominant decay mode would be to a <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>t</i:mi><i:mover accent="true"><i:mi>t</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">¯</i:mo></i:mover></i:math> pair, but also to a very large <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msup><m:mi>G</m:mi><m:mrow><m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo><m:mn>1</m:mn><m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo></m:mrow></m:msup></m:math> width, necessitating the use of a renormalized <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:msup><q:mi>G</q:mi><q:mrow><q:mo stretchy="false">(</q:mo><q:mn>1</q:mn><q:mo stretchy="false">)</q:mo></q:mrow></q:msup></q:math> propagator. This, along with the presence of large backgrounds (specially <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>t</u:mi><u:mover accent="true"><u:mi>t</u:mi><u:mo stretchy="false">¯</u:mo></u:mover><u:mi>j</u:mi><u:mi>j</u:mi></u:math>), renders a conventional cut-based analysis ineffective, yielding only marginal significances of only around <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mrow><y:mn>2</y:mn><y:mi>σ</y:mi></y:mrow></y:math>. The use of machine learning (ML) techniques alleviates this problem to a great extent. In particular, the use of artificial neural networks helps us identify the most discriminating observables, thereby allowing a significance in excess of <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mrow><ab:mn>4</ab:mn><ab:mi>σ</ab:mi></ab:mrow></ab:math> for <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msup><cb:mi>G</cb:mi><cb:mrow><cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo><cb:mn>1</cb:mn><cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:math> masses of <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><gb:mo>∼</gb:mo><gb:mn>4</gb:mn><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mi>TeV</gb:mi></gb:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.075020
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boosted four-top production at the LHC: A window to Randall-Sundrum or extended color symmetry

Kuldeep Deka, Debajyoti Choudhury, Lalit Kumar Saini
2 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
1.32
article

Boosted four-top production at the LHC: A window to Randall-Sundrum or extended color symmetry

Kuldeep Deka, Debajyoti Choudhury, Lalit Kumar Saini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Scenarios seeking to address the issue of electroweak symmetry breaking often have heavy colored gauge bosons coupling preferentially to the top quark. Considering the bulk Randall-Sundrum as a typical example, we consider the prospects of the first Kaluza-Klein mode (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msup><a:mi>G</a:mi><a:mrow><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>1</a:mn><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msup></a:math>) of the gluon being produced at the LHC in association with a <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>t</e:mi><e:mover accent="true"><e:mi>t</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">¯</e:mo></e:mover></e:math> pair. The enhanced coupling not only dictates that the dominant decay mode would be to a <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>t</i:mi><i:mover accent="true"><i:mi>t</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">¯</i:mo></i:mover></i:math> pair, but also to a very large <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msup><m:mi>G</m:mi><m:mrow><m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo><m:mn>1</m:mn><m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo></m:mrow></m:msup></m:math> width, necessitating the use of a renormalized <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:msup><q:mi>G</q:mi><q:mrow><q:mo stretchy="false">(</q:mo><q:mn>1</q:mn><q:mo stretchy="false">)</q:mo></q:mrow></q:msup></q:math> propagator. This, along with the presence of large backgrounds (specially <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>t</u:mi><u:mover accent="true"><u:mi>t</u:mi><u:mo stretchy="false">¯</u:mo></u:mover><u:mi>j</u:mi><u:mi>j</u:mi></u:math>), renders a conventional cut-based analysis ineffective, yielding only marginal significances of only around <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mrow><y:mn>2</y:mn><y:mi>σ</y:mi></y:mrow></y:math>. The use of machine learning (ML) techniques alleviates this problem to a great extent. In particular, the use of artificial neural networks helps us identify the most discriminating observables, thereby allowing a significance in excess of <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mrow><ab:mn>4</ab:mn><ab:mi>σ</ab:mi></ab:mrow></ab:math> for <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msup><cb:mi>G</cb:mi><cb:mrow><cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo><cb:mn>1</cb:mn><cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:math> masses of <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><gb:mo>∼</gb:mo><gb:mn>4</gb:mn><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mi>TeV</gb:mi></gb:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(7)
University of Delhi (IN), New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Institute of Physics, Bhubaneshwar (IN), New York University (US)
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, University Grants Commission, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.