Gas Injection Dynamics and Hydrogen Storage in Carbonate Reservoirs: Core-Flooding and Molecular Simulation Study

Geological hydrogen storage in carbonate reservoirs is a promising method for transitioning to clean energy sources. Gas displacement behavior in porous media is critical for evaluating gas saturation, fluid migration, and storage security. Due to the limited studies in this area, a comprehensive experimental and molecular modeling assessment of various gases (CO2, CH4, N2, and H2) and their flow characteristics during drainage displacement in carbonate reservoirs is presented. Core-flooding experiments are performed on dry and brine-saturated limestone samples to examine the impact of capillary and viscous forces on differential pressure profiles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are employed to study potential interactions in fluid–fluid, fluid–rock, and fluid–fluid–rock systems; results indicate that both viscous and capillary forces directly influence differential pressure profiles. The highest average differential pressure is observed with CO2 injection, while H2 exhibits the lowest due to differences in viscous forces. The injection of CO2 also demonstrated the highest water recovery at 42.77%, followed by CH4 (34.11%), N2 (29.02%), and H2 (23.42%). The calculated capillary number values are low (×10–8), suggesting that all gases quickly entered the pores upon injection and acted as nonwetting phases. When the flow rate is reduced to match the H2 capillary number, the average differential pressure decreases, and water recovery is similar to that of H2 at 2 cm3/min. This indicates that capillary pressure and gas saturation are not significantly affected by the gas type. MD simulations revealed that the contact angle is zero for all systems, confirming that all gases act as nonwetting phases and that capillary pressure variations are due to differences in interfacial tensions and pore radii. Additionally, H2 adsorption on pure calcite and brine surfaces was found to be lower compared to CO2. Through this study, an enhanced understanding of gas drainage displacement behavior and underground hydrogen storage dynamics in carbonate reservoirs is promoted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03699
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gas Injection Dynamics and Hydrogen Storage in Carbonate Reservoirs: Core-Flooding and Molecular Simulation Study

Abdulaziz Al-Qasim, Ahmed Zarzor Al-Yaseri, Ahmed Fatah, Salem Alshammari
20 citations
Energy & Fuels
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
5.38
article

Gas Injection Dynamics and Hydrogen Storage in Carbonate Reservoirs: Core-Flooding and Molecular Simulation Study

Abdulaziz Al-Qasim, Ahmed Zarzor Al-Yaseri, Ahmed Fatah, Salem Alshammari
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Geological hydrogen storage in carbonate reservoirs is a promising method for transitioning to clean energy sources. Gas displacement behavior in porous media is critical for evaluating gas saturation, fluid migration, and storage security. Due to the limited studies in this area, a comprehensive experimental and molecular modeling assessment of various gases (CO2, CH4, N2, and H2) and their flow characteristics during drainage displacement in carbonate reservoirs is presented. Core-flooding experiments are performed on dry and brine-saturated limestone samples to examine the impact of capillary and viscous forces on differential pressure profiles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are employed to study potential interactions in fluid–fluid, fluid–rock, and fluid–fluid–rock systems; results indicate that both viscous and capillary forces directly influence differential pressure profiles. The highest average differential pressure is observed with CO2 injection, while H2 exhibits the lowest due to differences in viscous forces. The injection of CO2 also demonstrated the highest water recovery at 42.77%, followed by CH4 (34.11%), N2 (29.02%), and H2 (23.42%). The calculated capillary number values are low (×10–8), suggesting that all gases quickly entered the pores upon injection and acted as nonwetting phases. When the flow rate is reduced to match the H2 capillary number, the average differential pressure decreases, and water recovery is similar to that of H2 at 2 cm3/min. This indicates that capillary pressure and gas saturation are not significantly affected by the gas type. MD simulations revealed that the contact angle is zero for all systems, confirming that all gases act as nonwetting phases and that capillary pressure variations are due to differences in interfacial tensions and pore radii. Additionally, H2 adsorption on pure calcite and brine surfaces was found to be lower compared to CO2. Through this study, an enhanced understanding of gas drainage displacement behavior and underground hydrogen storage dynamics in carbonate reservoirs is promoted.

Energy & FuelsVol. 38(21)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Reservoir Labs (United States) (US), University of Petroleum (ID), Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA), Saudi Aramco (United States) (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
5.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.