Deciding Difficult Questions of Professional Ethics: A Model of Nuanced Decision-Making

Our panel-"Civility, Professionalism, and Ethics in Defining the Lawyering Career"-gave me the opportunity to study and reflect on the reasoning used by Judge Weis in his wellknown cases involving the determination of sanctions for violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Authors

Nathan M. Crystal

Publication Details

Journal: University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Published: 2024-10-17
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2024.1017
Primary Topic: Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Deciding Difficult Questions of Professional Ethics: A Model of Nuanced Decision-Making

Nathan M. Crystal

Oct 17, 2024

University of Pittsburgh Law Review

Legal Education and Practice Innovations

article

Deciding Difficult Questions of Professional Ethics: A Model of Nuanced Decision-Making

Nathan M. Crystal

October 17, 2024article en

Abstract

University of Pittsburgh Law ReviewVol. 85(3)

Peace, Justice and strong institutions

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%

Legal Education and Practice Innovations

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deciding Difficult Questions of Professional Ethics: A Model of Nuanced Decision-Making — Nathan M. Crystal · University of Pittsburgh Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS