Supplemental Jurisdiction and § 1367: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Rehnquist at the direction of Congress, the committee undertook a fifteen month study of the problems in the federal court system. 1 The final report was issued in 1990 and made a series of recommendations addressing a broad range of topics including tax jurisdiction, narcotics prosecutions, habeas cases, sentencing reform, disability adjudications, and diversity jurisdiction, which the committee recommended eliminating entirely. 2 With one noteworthy exception, all of the recommendations were intended to reduce the workload of the federal courts. 3That one exception concerned supplemental jurisdiction.The committee recommended that Congress should statutorily authorize supplemental jurisdiction. 4This recommendation came in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Finley v. United States, which held that pendent party

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2024.1019
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supplemental Jurisdiction and § 1367: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Wendy Collins Perdue
University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Supplemental Jurisdiction and § 1367: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Wendy Collins Perdue
article en

Abstract

Rehnquist at the direction of Congress, the committee undertook a fifteen month study of the problems in the federal court system. 1 The final report was issued in 1990 and made a series of recommendations addressing a broad range of topics including tax jurisdiction, narcotics prosecutions, habeas cases, sentencing reform, disability adjudications, and diversity jurisdiction, which the committee recommended eliminating entirely. 2 With one noteworthy exception, all of the recommendations were intended to reduce the workload of the federal courts. 3That one exception concerned supplemental jurisdiction.The committee recommended that Congress should statutorily authorize supplemental jurisdiction. 4This recommendation came in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Finley v. United States, which held that pendent party

University of Pittsburgh Law ReviewVol. 85(3)
University of Pittsburgh
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.