Faster bladder filling in rats reduces detrusor overactivity but worsens (i.e., decreases) bladder compliance

The impact of bladder filling rate on cystometric outcomes remains unclear. Clinically, faster bladder filling is believed to increase the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity (DO) in those with bladder dysfunction, although evidence of this is lacking. We executed this study to clarify how changes in bladder filling rate impact cystometric parameters. Urethane-anesthetized female CD rats (<i>n</i> = 19) underwent bladder filling at five different fill rates, a baseline rate scaled to have a filling phase of ∼7 min (in line with our previous work) and scaled rates of 1/3×, 2×, 4×, and 8× that speed. Contrary to expectations, filling at faster rates decreased the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity, with 4× and 8× filling rates demonstrating less detrusor overactivity than the baseline (1×) rate (<i>P</i> = 0.0091 for 4× and <i>P</i> = 0.019 for 8×). However, faster filling rates did decrease bladder compliance. Filling at 4× and 8× demonstrated decreased bladder compliance compared to 1× (<i>P</i> = 0.032 for 4× and <i>P</i> < 0.0001 for 8×). Finally, increasing the filling rate led to increases in bladder capacity at 4× (<i>P</i> = 0.034) and 8× (<i>P</i> = 0.0066) relative to 1×. These results suggest that, contrary to expectations, faster filling may not be more effective at eliciting detrusor overactivity (i.e., not a better diagnostic approach). As reductions in detrusor overactivity and increases in bladder capacity are critical parameters for evaluating preclinical therapeutics, faster filling may impair the ability to demonstrate further improvements.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Little is known about the effects of different bladder filling rates on cystometric results. Various sources have suggested that faster filling is "provocative" to the bladder. However, in this study we varied bladder filling rates in anesthetized rats and observed less detrusor overactivity with faster filling, not more. We explain this discrepancy as a miscommunication about what being provocative means, where faster filling leads to worse bladder compliance (as we observed), not more detrusor overactivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00209.2024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faster bladder filling in rats reduces detrusor overactivity but worsens (i.e., decreases) bladder compliance

Jim Hokanson, Farshad Samadifam, Joseph M. Braun, Nick Slavik et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
0.54
article

Faster bladder filling in rats reduces detrusor overactivity but worsens (i.e., decreases) bladder compliance

Jim Hokanson, Farshad Samadifam, Joseph M. Braun, Nick Slavik, Wei He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The impact of bladder filling rate on cystometric outcomes remains unclear. Clinically, faster bladder filling is believed to increase the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity (DO) in those with bladder dysfunction, although evidence of this is lacking. We executed this study to clarify how changes in bladder filling rate impact cystometric parameters. Urethane-anesthetized female CD rats (<i>n</i> = 19) underwent bladder filling at five different fill rates, a baseline rate scaled to have a filling phase of ∼7 min (in line with our previous work) and scaled rates of 1/3×, 2×, 4×, and 8× that speed. Contrary to expectations, filling at faster rates decreased the likelihood of observing detrusor overactivity, with 4× and 8× filling rates demonstrating less detrusor overactivity than the baseline (1×) rate (<i>P</i> = 0.0091 for 4× and <i>P</i> = 0.019 for 8×). However, faster filling rates did decrease bladder compliance. Filling at 4× and 8× demonstrated decreased bladder compliance compared to 1× (<i>P</i> = 0.032 for 4× and <i>P</i> < 0.0001 for 8×). Finally, increasing the filling rate led to increases in bladder capacity at 4× (<i>P</i> = 0.034) and 8× (<i>P</i> = 0.0066) relative to 1×. These results suggest that, contrary to expectations, faster filling may not be more effective at eliciting detrusor overactivity (i.e., not a better diagnostic approach). As reductions in detrusor overactivity and increases in bladder capacity are critical parameters for evaluating preclinical therapeutics, faster filling may impair the ability to demonstrate further improvements.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Little is known about the effects of different bladder filling rates on cystometric results. Various sources have suggested that faster filling is "provocative" to the bladder. However, in this study we varied bladder filling rates in anesthetized rats and observed less detrusor overactivity with faster filling, not more. We explain this discrepancy as a miscommunication about what being provocative means, where faster filling leads to worse bladder compliance (as we observed), not more detrusor overactivity.

American Journal of Physiology-Renal PhysiologyVol. 327(6)
Marquette University (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.