The Effect of Course Delivery Mode on Student Performance and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study

There is an ongoing debate in the halls of traditional universities about the effectiveness of course delivery modes other than face-to-face instruction. This paper reports on a natural experiment that we were able to conduct in Spring 2022 as we offered the same course to similar student populations in three different delivery modes (face-to-face, synchronously online via Teams, and asynchronously online). While about a quarter of the students who responded to a survey about their preferred delivery mode who were not enrolled in a face-to-face class indicated that they preferred a face-to-face class, the experiment did not find any differences between the three groups in terms of their assessment of teaching or in their performance both in the course overall or in the individual assignments in the course. While the experiment may suffer some shortcomings, the results indicate that a well-designed online course, delivered synchronously or asynchronously, may encourage student learning more effectively than a face-to-face course.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Higher Education
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040050
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Course Delivery Mode on Student Performance and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study

Han Reichgelt, Tim C. Smith
Trends in Higher Education
Education and Learning Interventions
article

The Effect of Course Delivery Mode on Student Performance and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study

Han Reichgelt, Tim C. Smith
article en

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate in the halls of traditional universities about the effectiveness of course delivery modes other than face-to-face instruction. This paper reports on a natural experiment that we were able to conduct in Spring 2022 as we offered the same course to similar student populations in three different delivery modes (face-to-face, synchronously online via Teams, and asynchronously online). While about a quarter of the students who responded to a survey about their preferred delivery mode who were not enrolled in a face-to-face class indicated that they preferred a face-to-face class, the experiment did not find any differences between the three groups in terms of their assessment of teaching or in their performance both in the course overall or in the individual assignments in the course. While the experiment may suffer some shortcomings, the results indicate that a well-designed online course, delivered synchronously or asynchronously, may encourage student learning more effectively than a face-to-face course.

Trends in Higher EducationVol. 3(4)
University of South Florida (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effect of Course Delivery Mode on Student Performance and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study — Han Reichgelt, Tim C. Smith · Trends in Higher Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS