Can Different Cultivars of Panicum maximum Be Identified Using a VIS/NIR Sensor and Machine Learning?

Panicum maximum cultivars have distinct characteristics, especially morphological ones related to the leaf structure and coloration, and there may be differences in the spectral behavior captured by sensors. These differences can be used in classification using machine learning (ML) algorithms to differentiate biodiversity within the same species. The objectives of this study were to identify ML models able to differentiate P. maximum cultivars and determine which is the best spectral input for these algorithms and whether reducing the sample size improves the response of the algorithms. The experiment was carried out at the experimental area of the Forage Sector of the School Farm belonging to the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS). The leaf samples of the cultivars Massai, Mombaça, Tamani, Quênia, and Zuri were collected from experimental plots in the field. Analysis was carried out on 120 leaf samples from the P. maximum cultivars using a VIS/NIR hyperspectral sensor. After obtaining the spectral data and separating them into bands, the data were submitted for ML analysis to classify the cultivars based on the spectral variables. The algorithms tested were artificial neural networks (ANNs), REPTree and J48 decision trees, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). A logistic regression (LR) was used as a traditional classification method. Two input models were evaluated in the algorithms: the entire spectrum band provided by the sensor (ALL) and another input configuration using the calculated bands. The reflectances from the P. maximum cultivars showed different behavior, especially in the green and NIR regions. RL and ANN algorithms using all information in the spectrum are able to accurately classify the cultivars, reaching accuracies above 70 for CC and above 0.6 for kappa and F-score. VIS/NIR leaf reflectance can be a powerful tool for low-cost, non-destructive, and high-performance analysis to distinguish P. maximum cultivars. Here, we achieved better model accuracy using only 40 leaf samples. In the present study, the J48 decision tree model proved to have good classification performance regardless of the sample size used, which makes it a strategic model for forage cultivar classification studies in smaller or larger datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6040213
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Different Cultivars of Panicum maximum Be Identified Using a VIS/NIR Sensor and Machine Learning?

Dthenifer Cordeiro Santana, Juliana Caroline Santos Santana, Aryadne Rhoana Dias Chaves, Gelson dos Santos Difante et al.
2 citations
AgriEngineering
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
0.92
article

Can Different Cultivars of Panicum maximum Be Identified Using a VIS/NIR Sensor and Machine Learning?

Dthenifer Cordeiro Santana, Juliana Caroline Santos Santana, Aryadne Rhoana Dias Chaves, Gelson dos Santos Difante, Vanessa Zirondi Longhini, Paulo Eduardo Teodoro, Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo, Alexandre Menezes Dias, Néstor Eduardo Villamizar Frontado, Fábio Henrique Rojo Baio, Izabela Cristina de Oliveira, Gabriela Oliveira de Aquino Monteiro, Larissa Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro, Carlos Antônio da Silva, Gabriela Souza Oliveira, Jéssica Gomes Rodrigues
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Panicum maximum cultivars have distinct characteristics, especially morphological ones related to the leaf structure and coloration, and there may be differences in the spectral behavior captured by sensors. These differences can be used in classification using machine learning (ML) algorithms to differentiate biodiversity within the same species. The objectives of this study were to identify ML models able to differentiate P. maximum cultivars and determine which is the best spectral input for these algorithms and whether reducing the sample size improves the response of the algorithms. The experiment was carried out at the experimental area of the Forage Sector of the School Farm belonging to the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS). The leaf samples of the cultivars Massai, Mombaça, Tamani, Quênia, and Zuri were collected from experimental plots in the field. Analysis was carried out on 120 leaf samples from the P. maximum cultivars using a VIS/NIR hyperspectral sensor. After obtaining the spectral data and separating them into bands, the data were submitted for ML analysis to classify the cultivars based on the spectral variables. The algorithms tested were artificial neural networks (ANNs), REPTree and J48 decision trees, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). A logistic regression (LR) was used as a traditional classification method. Two input models were evaluated in the algorithms: the entire spectrum band provided by the sensor (ALL) and another input configuration using the calculated bands. The reflectances from the P. maximum cultivars showed different behavior, especially in the green and NIR regions. RL and ANN algorithms using all information in the spectrum are able to accurately classify the cultivars, reaching accuracies above 70 for CC and above 0.6 for kappa and F-score. VIS/NIR leaf reflectance can be a powerful tool for low-cost, non-destructive, and high-performance analysis to distinguish P. maximum cultivars. Here, we achieved better model accuracy using only 40 leaf samples. In the present study, the J48 decision tree model proved to have good classification performance regardless of the sample size used, which makes it a strategic model for forage cultivar classification studies in smaller or larger datasets.

AgriEngineeringVol. 6(4)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (BR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.