“I have come to the conclusion that you must die”

Abstract This paper explores the linguistic realisation of threats in a corpus of threatening letters discussed in Late Modern English ( lm od e ) criminal trials at the Old Bailey. After investigating how trial participants ascribe the action of “threatening” to the utterance in question, I examine which aspects are repeatedly addressed in the letters and which linguistic patterns are employed to perform the threat. The results show that speakers routinely address the preparatory and sincerity conditions of commissives to negotiate whether a letter is threatening. Compared to present-day threats, lm od e threats are considerably less speaker-focussed, and more threats explicitly specify threatener, target, and type of harm to be carried out. Linguistically, lm od e threatening letters contain a greater amount of taboo language and more non-conditional and retaliative threats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23016.neu
Primary Topic
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I have come to the conclusion that you must die”

Theresa Neumaier
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
article

“I have come to the conclusion that you must die”

Theresa Neumaier
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the linguistic realisation of threats in a corpus of threatening letters discussed in Late Modern English ( lm od e ) criminal trials at the Old Bailey. After investigating how trial participants ascribe the action of “threatening” to the utterance in question, I examine which aspects are repeatedly addressed in the letters and which linguistic patterns are employed to perform the threat. The results show that speakers routinely address the preparatory and sincerity conditions of commissives to negotiate whether a letter is threatening. Compared to present-day threats, lm od e threats are considerably less speaker-focussed, and more threats explicitly specify threatener, target, and type of harm to be carried out. Linguistically, lm od e threatening letters contain a greater amount of taboo language and more non-conditional and retaliative threats.

Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 26(2)
TU Dortmund University (DE), ELTE Research Centre for Linguistics (HU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.