Factors Associated with Multimodal Care Practices for Cancer Cachexia among Pharmacists

Pharmacists' roles in cachexia care are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the knowledge and practice of cachexia care and identify factors related to the practice of cachexia care among pharmacists. Information on the knowledge and practice of cachexia care was obtained. Components of practicing multimodal care were evaluated. Participants were categorized into two groups according to practicing multimodal care levels. Comparisons were made between the groups, and multiple regression analysis was employed. Of the 451 pharmacists, 243 responded. They were categorized into the Practicing group (n = 119) and Not practicing group (n = 124). Significant differences were observed for the number of advanced cancer patients/month, frequency of caring for them, and involvement in training programs on cachexia. The Practicing group had significantly better knowledge about cachexia. The Practicing group used guidelines, items, and symptoms more frequently to detect cachexia. The Practicing group tended to detect cachexia and initiate interventions in earlier phases and in patients with a better status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the most significant factor was the regular provision of care (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.92). The regular provision of care was associated with the practice of multimodal care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100457
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated with Multimodal Care Practices for Cancer Cachexia among Pharmacists

Eriko Satomi, Takashi Takeuchi, Tomomi Yamada, Sayaka Arakawa et al.
2 citations
Current Oncology
Nutrition and Health in Aging
0.65
article

Factors Associated with Multimodal Care Practices for Cancer Cachexia among Pharmacists

Eriko Satomi, Takashi Takeuchi, Tomomi Yamada, Sayaka Arakawa, Saori Koshimoto, Koji Amano, Hiroto Ishiki, Tatsuya Morita, Satomi Okamura, Naoharu Mori
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pharmacists' roles in cachexia care are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the knowledge and practice of cachexia care and identify factors related to the practice of cachexia care among pharmacists. Information on the knowledge and practice of cachexia care was obtained. Components of practicing multimodal care were evaluated. Participants were categorized into two groups according to practicing multimodal care levels. Comparisons were made between the groups, and multiple regression analysis was employed. Of the 451 pharmacists, 243 responded. They were categorized into the Practicing group (n = 119) and Not practicing group (n = 124). Significant differences were observed for the number of advanced cancer patients/month, frequency of caring for them, and involvement in training programs on cachexia. The Practicing group had significantly better knowledge about cachexia. The Practicing group used guidelines, items, and symptoms more frequently to detect cachexia. The Practicing group tended to detect cachexia and initiate interventions in earlier phases and in patients with a better status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the most significant factor was the regular provision of care (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.92). The regular provision of care was associated with the practice of multimodal care.

Current OncologyVol. 31(10)
Aichi Medical University (JP), Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP), Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), Osaka University Hospital (JP), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP), Tokyo Kasei Gakuin University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.