Korea-US-Japan Cooperation and Wedge Strategy: Export Restrictions and GSOMIA

While the United States led the ROK-US and US-Japan alliances in Northeast Asia, it also strengthened ROK-US-Japan security cooperation to respond to threats from China and North Korea, and led the ROK-Japan GSOMIA to reduce the burden on the United States. However, in this situation, Japan attempted to negatively affect the Korean economy by strengthening export regulations against Korea. Although Korea and Japan are not alliance, but they are also called quasi-alliances/coalitions. Despite the threats from North Korea and China, why did Japan choose tension/conflict rather than cooperation with Korea? And why did the Korean government propose the termination of GSOMIA as a countermeasure? This study focused on inter-state relations, especially tension/conflict rather than cooperation within the alliance. Through a study of the crisis situation that led to Japan’s export regulations and Korea’s termination of GSOMIA, I would like to argue that actions between countries within an alliance are not limited to cooperation, but can harm member countries for the sake of their own national interests.

Publication Details

Journal
East and West Studies
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29274/ews.2024.36.3.245
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Korea-US-Japan Cooperation and Wedge Strategy: Export Restrictions and GSOMIA

East and West Studies
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

Korea-US-Japan Cooperation and Wedge Strategy: Export Restrictions and GSOMIA

article en

Abstract

While the United States led the ROK-US and US-Japan alliances in Northeast Asia, it also strengthened ROK-US-Japan security cooperation to respond to threats from China and North Korea, and led the ROK-Japan GSOMIA to reduce the burden on the United States. However, in this situation, Japan attempted to negatively affect the Korean economy by strengthening export regulations against Korea. Although Korea and Japan are not alliance, but they are also called quasi-alliances/coalitions. Despite the threats from North Korea and China, why did Japan choose tension/conflict rather than cooperation with Korea? And why did the Korean government propose the termination of GSOMIA as a countermeasure? This study focused on inter-state relations, especially tension/conflict rather than cooperation within the alliance. Through a study of the crisis situation that led to Japan’s export regulations and Korea’s termination of GSOMIA, I would like to argue that actions between countries within an alliance are not limited to cooperation, but can harm member countries for the sake of their own national interests.

East and West StudiesVol. 36(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Korea-US-Japan Cooperation and Wedge Strategy: Export Restrictions and GSOMIA · East and West Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS