Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking

This study examined the relationship between intelligence and creativity using divergent-exploratory and convergent-integrative thinking as key concepts. Researchers analyzed secondary data from 854 children, including 238 children with high intellectual potential (IQ > 130). Intelligence was measured using WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children), and creativity was assessed through EPoC (Evaluation of Potential for Creativity). Segmented Regression Analysis (SRA) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) explored these relationships. Positive correlations were found between convergent-integrative thinking and verbal comprehension or processing speed. However, no significant breakpoints were detected between Total IQ and creative potential sub-dimensions. A sufficient level of processing speed was necessary for achieving high divergent-exploratory thinking scores, while minimum levels of Total IQ or fluid reasoning were required for convergent-integrative thinking. The study suggested using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) to capture complex, non-linear relationships. This approach offers educational insights by highlighting cognitive strengths and weaknesses in assessments. • Total IQ or fluid reasoning sufficient levels are required for convergent thinking • Sufficient levels of processing speed are required for divergent thinking • Convergent thinking is associated with verbal comprehension and processing speed • Convergent and divergent tasks are needed in intelligence-creativity assessments • Educational approaches can benefit from including diverse thinking modes

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102575
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking

Sylvie Tordjman, Maxence Mercier, Solenn Kermarrec, Cyrille Feybesse et al.
7 citations
Learning and Individual Differences
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
3.55
article

Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking

Sylvie Tordjman, Maxence Mercier, Solenn Kermarrec, Cyrille Feybesse, Todd Lubart, M Déchaume, Gaëlle Chouvelon
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between intelligence and creativity using divergent-exploratory and convergent-integrative thinking as key concepts. Researchers analyzed secondary data from 854 children, including 238 children with high intellectual potential (IQ > 130). Intelligence was measured using WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children), and creativity was assessed through EPoC (Evaluation of Potential for Creativity). Segmented Regression Analysis (SRA) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) explored these relationships. Positive correlations were found between convergent-integrative thinking and verbal comprehension or processing speed. However, no significant breakpoints were detected between Total IQ and creative potential sub-dimensions. A sufficient level of processing speed was necessary for achieving high divergent-exploratory thinking scores, while minimum levels of Total IQ or fluid reasoning were required for convergent-integrative thinking. The study suggested using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) to capture complex, non-linear relationships. This approach offers educational insights by highlighting cognitive strengths and weaknesses in assessments. • Total IQ or fluid reasoning sufficient levels are required for convergent thinking • Sufficient levels of processing speed are required for divergent thinking • Convergent thinking is associated with verbal comprehension and processing speed • Convergent and divergent tasks are needed in intelligence-creativity assessments • Educational approaches can benefit from including diverse thinking modes

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 116
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d’Aquitaine (FR), Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Laboratoire de Psychologie et d’Ergonomie Appliquées (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
3.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.