Exploring design space: Machine learning for multi-objective materials design optimization with enhanced evaluation strategies

Discovering optimal material designs in the design space can be significantly accelerated by leveraging machine learning (ML) models for screening candidates. However, the quality of these designs depends on the prediction accuracy of the ML models and the efficiency of the optimization algorithms used. This study comprehensively compares different ML modeling strategies, optimization algorithms and evaluation strategies. Thereby, automated ML, tree-based ML models and neural networks were compared. Various optimization algorithms were analyzed, including random search, evolutionary and swarm-based methods. In addition, different strategies for evaluating the predictive performance of the ML models were investigated, which is particularly important as these models are expected to predict design parameters that deviate significantly from the known designs in the training data throughout the optimization. Our results highlight the capability of the proposed workflow to discover material designs that significantly outperform those within the training database and approach theoretical optima. Overall, this research contributes to advancing the field of material design optimization by providing a versatile and practical workflow that introduces automated ML into material design optimization and new model error assessment strategies tailored explicitly to optimization tasks. • Benchmarking ML models and optimizers for multi-objective materials optimization. • Applied automated machine learning for enhanced optimization efficiency. • Introduced novel evaluation strategies for assessing ML model performance. • Achieved near Pareto optimal designs with minimal data using AutoSklearn and CMA-ES.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Materials Science
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113432
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring design space: Machine learning for multi-objective materials design optimization with enhanced evaluation strategies

Michael Kaliske, Hajo Wiemer, Felix Conrad, Julien Philipp Stöcker et al.
12 citations
Computational Materials Science
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
4.19
article

Exploring design space: Machine learning for multi-objective materials design optimization with enhanced evaluation strategies

Michael Kaliske, Hajo Wiemer, Felix Conrad, Julien Philipp Stöcker, Isabela de Paula Salgado, Steffen Ihlenfeldt, Cesare Signorini
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Discovering optimal material designs in the design space can be significantly accelerated by leveraging machine learning (ML) models for screening candidates. However, the quality of these designs depends on the prediction accuracy of the ML models and the efficiency of the optimization algorithms used. This study comprehensively compares different ML modeling strategies, optimization algorithms and evaluation strategies. Thereby, automated ML, tree-based ML models and neural networks were compared. Various optimization algorithms were analyzed, including random search, evolutionary and swarm-based methods. In addition, different strategies for evaluating the predictive performance of the ML models were investigated, which is particularly important as these models are expected to predict design parameters that deviate significantly from the known designs in the training data throughout the optimization. Our results highlight the capability of the proposed workflow to discover material designs that significantly outperform those within the training database and approach theoretical optima. Overall, this research contributes to advancing the field of material design optimization by providing a versatile and practical workflow that introduces automated ML into material design optimization and new model error assessment strategies tailored explicitly to optimization tasks. • Benchmarking ML models and optimizers for multi-objective materials optimization. • Applied automated machine learning for enhanced optimization efficiency. • Introduced novel evaluation strategies for assessing ML model performance. • Achieved near Pareto optimal designs with minimal data using AutoSklearn and CMA-ES.

Computational Materials ScienceVol. 246
Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (DE), United Nations University (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.