A fast hybrid approach for continuous land cover change monitoring and semantic segmentation using satellite time series

• LCC and LCM in land cover change are detected separately. • Combined CCDC and BEAST algorithms for change detection. • CCDC temporal features combined with DCNN model for classification. Land cover change detection and classification, including both inter-class changes (land cover conversion, LCC) and intra-class changes (land cover modification, LCM), is critical for understanding the Earth’s dynamic processes and promoting sustainability. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on LCC, with less emphasis on LCM. Land cover classification remains challenging, and its mapping results are often affected by salt and pepper noise. Here, we propose a hybrid approach for continuous change detection and classification of LCC and LCM using Jinchang City, China, as a case study. Firstly, we combined the Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) and the Bayesian Estimator of Abrupt change, Seasonal change, and Trend (BEAST) algorithms to identify LCC and LCM using all available Landsat time series (TS) data from 2000 to 2020. Then, the harmonic regression coefficients and RMSE values derived from CCDC (hereafter called CCDC features) were fed into the DCNN model for LCC classification. Our findings indicate: (1) For LCC and LCM accuracy assessment, the CCDC and BEAST ensemble achieved a spatial F1 score of 82.7% and an average temporal F1 score of 79.7%. (2) In LCC classification, the DCNN model with CCDC features, particularly DeepLabV3+, outperformed the pixel-based XGBoost and other multi-year land cover products, with frequency-weighted intersection over union (FWIoU), overall accuracy, and Kappa scores of 88.7%, 94%, and 0.87, respectively. (3) Seasonal LCM showed a more concentrated distribution than trend LCM. (4) In Jinchang City, LCM larger than LCC in area, and grassland and cultivated land are the most distributed. Our approach can be contributed to wall-to-wall land surface monitoring and enhance land management capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104222
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A fast hybrid approach for continuous land cover change monitoring and semantic segmentation using satellite time series

Rongfang Lyu, Jili Pang, Jianming Zhang, Wenpeng Zhao et al.
4 citations
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.84
article

A fast hybrid approach for continuous land cover change monitoring and semantic segmentation using satellite time series

Rongfang Lyu, Jili Pang, Jianming Zhang, Wenpeng Zhao, Jinming Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• LCC and LCM in land cover change are detected separately. • Combined CCDC and BEAST algorithms for change detection. • CCDC temporal features combined with DCNN model for classification. Land cover change detection and classification, including both inter-class changes (land cover conversion, LCC) and intra-class changes (land cover modification, LCM), is critical for understanding the Earth’s dynamic processes and promoting sustainability. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on LCC, with less emphasis on LCM. Land cover classification remains challenging, and its mapping results are often affected by salt and pepper noise. Here, we propose a hybrid approach for continuous change detection and classification of LCC and LCM using Jinchang City, China, as a case study. Firstly, we combined the Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) and the Bayesian Estimator of Abrupt change, Seasonal change, and Trend (BEAST) algorithms to identify LCC and LCM using all available Landsat time series (TS) data from 2000 to 2020. Then, the harmonic regression coefficients and RMSE values derived from CCDC (hereafter called CCDC features) were fed into the DCNN model for LCC classification. Our findings indicate: (1) For LCC and LCM accuracy assessment, the CCDC and BEAST ensemble achieved a spatial F1 score of 82.7% and an average temporal F1 score of 79.7%. (2) In LCC classification, the DCNN model with CCDC features, particularly DeepLabV3+, outperformed the pixel-based XGBoost and other multi-year land cover products, with frequency-weighted intersection over union (FWIoU), overall accuracy, and Kappa scores of 88.7%, 94%, and 0.87, respectively. (3) Seasonal LCM showed a more concentrated distribution than trend LCM. (4) In Jinchang City, LCM larger than LCC in area, and grassland and cultivated land are the most distributed. Our approach can be contributed to wall-to-wall land surface monitoring and enhance land management capabilities.

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationVol. 134
Lanzhou University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.