Global Atrocity Justice Constellations

In this brief introduction we explain the origins of the 13 papers in the Global Atrocity Justice Constellations project, and identify some important characteristics of the countries covered. The introduction identifies a diverse set of engagements between states and international criminal justice shaped by historical experience, domestic politics and resources. We find that as a collectiion the papers highlight a complex and dynamic landscape of atrocity justice, where International Criminal Tribunals (ICTs) serve as crucial but not isolated nodes within a broader, interconnected framework of justice delivery. The success of atrocity justice on a global scale, therefore, hinges not just on the strength of ICTs but on the willingness and capacity of states to prosecute international crimes within their own judicial systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Criminal Law Review
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10216
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Atrocity Justice Constellations

Andy Aydın‐Aitchison, Mirza Buljubašić, Camilo Tamayo Gómez, Kjersti Lohne et al.
International Criminal Law Review
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Global Atrocity Justice Constellations

Andy Aydın‐Aitchison, Mirza Buljubašić, Camilo Tamayo Gómez, Kjersti Lohne, Vasilka Sancin
article en

Abstract

In this brief introduction we explain the origins of the 13 papers in the Global Atrocity Justice Constellations project, and identify some important characteristics of the countries covered. The introduction identifies a diverse set of engagements between states and international criminal justice shaped by historical experience, domestic politics and resources. We find that as a collectiion the papers highlight a complex and dynamic landscape of atrocity justice, where International Criminal Tribunals (ICTs) serve as crucial but not isolated nodes within a broader, interconnected framework of justice delivery. The success of atrocity justice on a global scale, therefore, hinges not just on the strength of ICTs but on the willingness and capacity of states to prosecute international crimes within their own judicial systems.

International Criminal Law ReviewVol. 24(5-6)
University of Sarajevo (BA), University of Huddersfield (GB), University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Oslo (NO), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.