Towards FAIRification of learning resources and catalogues—lessons learnt from research communities

Since the introduction of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles in 2016, discussions have evolved beyond the original focus on research data to include learning resources. In 2020, a set of simple rules to FAIRify learning resources was proposed, building on existing expertise within the training community. Disciplinary communities have played an important role in advancing FAIR principles for learning resources, although they have approached FAIRification activities in different ways. These communities range from volunteer-led to funded and independent organisations, however commonly include activities such as organising training and capacity building, and coordinated discussions on disciplinary-focused FAIR best practises and standards. Eight disciplinary community case studies are presented and analysed in this paper to examine the motivations, challenges and opportunities towards FAIRification of learning resources, reflecting on how community structure leads to differing responsibilities. The case studies are based on reflections formulated in 2022, the aim is to pull together the experiences of these different communities, focusing on the processes and challenges they encountered, in order to structure this knowledge across different learning platforms, draw attention to the question of sustainability for learning resources and anticipate improvements in future policies and governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1390444
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards FAIRification of learning resources and catalogues—lessons learnt from research communities

Iulianna van der Lek-Ciudin, Helen Clare, Iryna Kuchma, Irena Vipavc Brvar et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Education
Research Data Management Practices
1.56
article

Towards FAIRification of learning resources and catalogues—lessons learnt from research communities

Iulianna van der Lek-Ciudin, Helen Clare, Iryna Kuchma, Irena Vipavc Brvar, Ricarda Braukmann, Ellen Leenarts, Louise Bezuidenhout, Celia van Gelder, Shanmugasundaram Venkataraman, Flávio Azevedo, Lottie Provost, Lisanna Paladin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Since the introduction of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles in 2016, discussions have evolved beyond the original focus on research data to include learning resources. In 2020, a set of simple rules to FAIRify learning resources was proposed, building on existing expertise within the training community. Disciplinary communities have played an important role in advancing FAIR principles for learning resources, although they have approached FAIRification activities in different ways. These communities range from volunteer-led to funded and independent organisations, however commonly include activities such as organising training and capacity building, and coordinated discussions on disciplinary-focused FAIR best practises and standards. Eight disciplinary community case studies are presented and analysed in this paper to examine the motivations, challenges and opportunities towards FAIRification of learning resources, reflecting on how community structure leads to differing responsibilities. The case studies are based on reflections formulated in 2022, the aim is to pull together the experiences of these different communities, focusing on the processes and challenges they encountered, in order to structure this knowledge across different learning platforms, draw attention to the question of sustainability for learning resources and anticipate improvements in future policies and governance.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
Leiden University (NL), University of Ljubljana (SI), Hellenic Open University (GR), Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Institute for Computational Linguistics “A. Zampolli” (IT), European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE), Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure (NL), OpenAIRE Non-Profit Civil Partnership, Jisc (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Research Data Management Practices
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.