Metabolic obesity phenotypes and the risk of cancer: a prospective study of the Kailuan cohort

Background Obesity is as an important risk factor for chronic diseases. Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) is considered a benign state. The association between metabolic health and obesity categories and cancer risk remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between metabolic health status combined with obesity phenotypes and the risk of cancer. Methods Data from 91,834 participants in the Kailuan cohort were analyzed, excluding individuals with a body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m² and those with a history of cancer. Obesity phenotypes were classified based on BMI and waist circumference (WC) combined with metabolic health status, resulting in six phenotypes. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess the association between metabolic health and obesity phenotypes with cancer risk and all-cause mortality. Results The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity and metabolically unhealthy obesity defined by BMI was 6.86% and 12.18%, while that defined by WC was 20.79% and 25.76%, respectively. Compared to metabolically healthy participants, individuals with an unhealthy metabolic status had a significantly higher risk of cancer (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.15; p=0.004). The hazard ratios for cancer were 1.19, 1.23, 1.20, and 1.55 for individuals with one, two, three, and four metabolic disorders, respectively. Among those classified as metabolically unhealthy, both overweight and obesity were associated with a protective effect on cancer risk (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80–0.96; p=0.006 for overweight; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78–0.97; p=0.010 for obesity). However, abdominal obesity significantly increased cancer risk in both metabolically healthy and unhealthy participants. In subgroup analysis, simple obesity showed a protective trend against cancer in those with respiratory cancers, while abdominal obesity consistently posed a risk for various cancer types. Conclusion Metabolically unhealthy status and abdominal obesity are risk factors for cancer and all-cause mortality, whereas simple obesity offers protective effects against cancer and all-cause mortality in metabolically unhealthy individuals. These findings suggest that maintaining metabolic health and reducing the metabolic risks associated with abdominal obesity should be key targets for cancer prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1333488
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolic obesity phenotypes and the risk of cancer: a prospective study of the Kailuan cohort

Ming Yang, Shiqi Lin, Qingsong Zhang, Xin Zheng et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
1.17
article

Metabolic obesity phenotypes and the risk of cancer: a prospective study of the Kailuan cohort

Ming Yang, Shiqi Lin, Qingsong Zhang, Xin Zheng, Heyang Zhang, Chenan Liu, Yiming Wang, Ying Liu, Yue Chen, Ziwen Wang, Xiaoyue Liu, Xiangming Ma, Li Deng, Jinyu Shi, Hanping Shi, Hailun Xie
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Background Obesity is as an important risk factor for chronic diseases. Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) is considered a benign state. The association between metabolic health and obesity categories and cancer risk remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between metabolic health status combined with obesity phenotypes and the risk of cancer. Methods Data from 91,834 participants in the Kailuan cohort were analyzed, excluding individuals with a body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m² and those with a history of cancer. Obesity phenotypes were classified based on BMI and waist circumference (WC) combined with metabolic health status, resulting in six phenotypes. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess the association between metabolic health and obesity phenotypes with cancer risk and all-cause mortality. Results The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity and metabolically unhealthy obesity defined by BMI was 6.86% and 12.18%, while that defined by WC was 20.79% and 25.76%, respectively. Compared to metabolically healthy participants, individuals with an unhealthy metabolic status had a significantly higher risk of cancer (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.15; p=0.004). The hazard ratios for cancer were 1.19, 1.23, 1.20, and 1.55 for individuals with one, two, three, and four metabolic disorders, respectively. Among those classified as metabolically unhealthy, both overweight and obesity were associated with a protective effect on cancer risk (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80–0.96; p=0.006 for overweight; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78–0.97; p=0.010 for obesity). However, abdominal obesity significantly increased cancer risk in both metabolically healthy and unhealthy participants. In subgroup analysis, simple obesity showed a protective trend against cancer in those with respiratory cancers, while abdominal obesity consistently posed a risk for various cancer types. Conclusion Metabolically unhealthy status and abdominal obesity are risk factors for cancer and all-cause mortality, whereas simple obesity offers protective effects against cancer and all-cause mortality in metabolically unhealthy individuals. These findings suggest that maintaining metabolic health and reducing the metabolic risks associated with abdominal obesity should be key targets for cancer prevention.

Frontiers in EndocrinologyVol. 15
Capital Medical University (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), China International Science and Technology Cooperation (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Kailuan General Hospital (CN), Beijing Shijitan Hospital (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.