Working at the level above: university promotion policies as a tool for wage theft and underpayment

Higher education has a strong relationship with wage theft, which has been examined throughout years of research, reports, and government enquiries. This paper examines the practices of wage theft that often surround academic promotions, and specifically, the common requirement that someone must already be working at the level for which they are hoping to be promoted. The work uses Australia’s higher education sector as an example, as Australia’s employment and promotion conditions are similar in many aspects to other higher education sectors. The paper provides an analysis of the promotion expectations to which academics are subjected to understand what tasks academics are expected to complete, and for how long, without being paid, before they can apply for promotion. The paper demonstrates to academics, policymakers, and unions, yet another exploitative practice that must be monitored and removed from the modern university as the sector looks to engage more equitable practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2412656
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working at the level above: university promotion policies as a tool for wage theft and underpayment

Kathleen Smithers, Troy Heffernan
10 citations
Higher Education Research & Development
Employment and Welfare Studies
8.49
article

Working at the level above: university promotion policies as a tool for wage theft and underpayment

Kathleen Smithers, Troy Heffernan
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Higher education has a strong relationship with wage theft, which has been examined throughout years of research, reports, and government enquiries. This paper examines the practices of wage theft that often surround academic promotions, and specifically, the common requirement that someone must already be working at the level for which they are hoping to be promoted. The work uses Australia’s higher education sector as an example, as Australia’s employment and promotion conditions are similar in many aspects to other higher education sectors. The paper provides an analysis of the promotion expectations to which academics are subjected to understand what tasks academics are expected to complete, and for how long, without being paid, before they can apply for promotion. The paper demonstrates to academics, policymakers, and unions, yet another exploitative practice that must be monitored and removed from the modern university as the sector looks to engage more equitable practices.

Higher Education Research & DevelopmentVol. 44(3)
Charles Sturt University (AU), University of Manchester (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Employment and Welfare Studies
8.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.