A method for determining efficiency parameters based on efficiency-quality graph in incremental sheet forming

This study reveals the mechanisms by which efficiency parameters affect surface quality, mechanical properties, and configuration offset in incremental sheet forming (ISF), focusing on surface morphology and microstructural evolution. By constructing an efficiency-quality graph, a method is developed to determine efficiency parameters that balance quality and efficiency synergistically. The results show that increasing the step depth ( Z ) and decreasing the feed rate ( v ) intensify plowing and adhesion effects at the interface, degrading surface quality and enriching the presence of {001}<100> Cube and {112}<111> Copper textures, while the cross-sectional crystal orientation remains unaffected. Additionally, increasing Z enlarges grain size and reduces high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs), amplifying micro-stress and defects, which deteriorates mechanical properties and increases configuration offset. Conversely, increasing v has minimal impact on mechanical properties but significantly increases configuration offset due to the rise in HAGBs, micro-stress, and defects. The efficiency-quality graph elucidates the complex synergistic relationship between forming efficiency and comprehensive quality of the formed parts, and the optimal efficiency parameters are identified by considering the priority order of different quality dimensions. Specifically, when prioritizing surface quality and hardness, the optimal parameters are Z = 0.1 mm and v = 5000 mm/min; when prioritizing configuration offset, the optimal parameters are Z = 0.1 mm and v = 1000 mm/min. Therefore, this study provides a comprehensive method for evaluating efficiency parameters in ISF, emphasizing the importance of balancing efficiency with quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A method for determining efficiency parameters based on efficiency-quality graph in incremental sheet forming

Shengdun Zhao, Guang-can YANG, Dawei Zhang, Chong Tian et al.
1 citations
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
0.21
article

A method for determining efficiency parameters based on efficiency-quality graph in incremental sheet forming

Shengdun Zhao, Guang-can YANG, Dawei Zhang, Chong Tian, Yang-Hu Hu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study reveals the mechanisms by which efficiency parameters affect surface quality, mechanical properties, and configuration offset in incremental sheet forming (ISF), focusing on surface morphology and microstructural evolution. By constructing an efficiency-quality graph, a method is developed to determine efficiency parameters that balance quality and efficiency synergistically. The results show that increasing the step depth ( Z ) and decreasing the feed rate ( v ) intensify plowing and adhesion effects at the interface, degrading surface quality and enriching the presence of {001}<100> Cube and {112}<111> Copper textures, while the cross-sectional crystal orientation remains unaffected. Additionally, increasing Z enlarges grain size and reduces high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs), amplifying micro-stress and defects, which deteriorates mechanical properties and increases configuration offset. Conversely, increasing v has minimal impact on mechanical properties but significantly increases configuration offset due to the rise in HAGBs, micro-stress, and defects. The efficiency-quality graph elucidates the complex synergistic relationship between forming efficiency and comprehensive quality of the formed parts, and the optimal efficiency parameters are identified by considering the priority order of different quality dimensions. Specifically, when prioritizing surface quality and hardness, the optimal parameters are Z = 0.1 mm and v = 5000 mm/min; when prioritizing configuration offset, the optimal parameters are Z = 0.1 mm and v = 1000 mm/min. Therefore, this study provides a comprehensive method for evaluating efficiency parameters in ISF, emphasizing the importance of balancing efficiency with quality.

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 33
Central South University (CN), Sinomach (China) (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.