Development and Validation of the TSTSIS Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Self-Efficacy to Teach Science Through Integrated STEM Approach

This study aimed to develop an instrument with acceptable validity and reliability for assessing two key aspects among science teachers: their self-efficacy in teaching science through an integrated STEM approach (STSIS) and their outcome expectancy when employing this approach (OETSIS), which we refer to as TSTSIS. We administered this tool to 109 science teachers in Phnom Penh city and various provinces in Cambodia. The results revealed that STSIS can be broken down into six essential latent factors. Among these factors, five are grouped under the theme of “Integrated STEM Instructional Self-Efficacy,” covering problem-based, robots-based, inquiry-based, engineering-based, and technology-based instructional self-efficacy. The sixth factor relates to teachers’ self-efficacy in terms of accessing materials. Author formulated the subscale “Expectations of High Students’ Achievement in Science” as the factor representing the OETSIS. Scores on the TSTSIS subscales offered evidence of its criterion validity, with significant differences observed across various teacher-related variables. These variables include teachers’ teaching qualifications, school types, teachers from schools where STEM education and an integrated STEM approach are part of the school’s objectives, and correlation with instructors’ teaching experience. The TSTSIS subscale lays the groundwork for designing STEM training programs tailored to the needs of science instructors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of STEM Education
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/15480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of the TSTSIS Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Self-Efficacy to Teach Science Through Integrated STEM Approach

Sokha Khut
1 citations
European Journal of STEM Education
Educational Research and Pedagogy
0.35
article

Development and Validation of the TSTSIS Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Self-Efficacy to Teach Science Through Integrated STEM Approach

Sokha Khut
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an instrument with acceptable validity and reliability for assessing two key aspects among science teachers: their self-efficacy in teaching science through an integrated STEM approach (STSIS) and their outcome expectancy when employing this approach (OETSIS), which we refer to as TSTSIS. We administered this tool to 109 science teachers in Phnom Penh city and various provinces in Cambodia. The results revealed that STSIS can be broken down into six essential latent factors. Among these factors, five are grouped under the theme of “Integrated STEM Instructional Self-Efficacy,” covering problem-based, robots-based, inquiry-based, engineering-based, and technology-based instructional self-efficacy. The sixth factor relates to teachers’ self-efficacy in terms of accessing materials. Author formulated the subscale “Expectations of High Students’ Achievement in Science” as the factor representing the OETSIS. Scores on the TSTSIS subscales offered evidence of its criterion validity, with significant differences observed across various teacher-related variables. These variables include teachers’ teaching qualifications, school types, teachers from schools where STEM education and an integrated STEM approach are part of the school’s objectives, and correlation with instructors’ teaching experience. The TSTSIS subscale lays the groundwork for designing STEM training programs tailored to the needs of science instructors.

European Journal of STEM EducationVol. 9(1)
Hiroshima University of Economics (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.