Assimilation and Delegation: A Formal Model of Federal-Tribal Dynamics

Indigenous peoples have long been subjected to assimilation campaigns during democratic state-building, often in the name of easing administration, aligning Indigenous and central government preferences, and increasing delegation of policy authority to tribes. Yet, empirically, it is not clear that assimilation is associated with increased delegation, and delegation to tribes engaged in anti-assimilation and anticolonial efforts is increasing. I introduce a formal model of delegation as a function of Indigenous assimilation. Delegation leverages the specialized information tribes hold and, in the standard model, is more likely for tribes with policy preferences closer to the central government. However, introducing an assimilation campaign into the model that the tribe can accept or reject instead leads to tribes refusing to assimilate in order to incentivize delegation. This research underscores the nuanced strategies tribes employ to ensure self-determination and supports reevaluation of assimilation as a policy tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000103
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assimilation and Delegation: A Formal Model of Federal-Tribal Dynamics

Sonja Castañeda Dower
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Assimilation and Delegation: A Formal Model of Federal-Tribal Dynamics

Sonja Castañeda Dower
article en

Abstract

Indigenous peoples have long been subjected to assimilation campaigns during democratic state-building, often in the name of easing administration, aligning Indigenous and central government preferences, and increasing delegation of policy authority to tribes. Yet, empirically, it is not clear that assimilation is associated with increased delegation, and delegation to tribes engaged in anti-assimilation and anticolonial efforts is increasing. I introduce a formal model of delegation as a function of Indigenous assimilation. Delegation leverages the specialized information tribes hold and, in the standard model, is more likely for tribes with policy preferences closer to the central government. However, introducing an assimilation campaign into the model that the tribe can accept or reject instead leads to tribes refusing to assimilate in order to incentivize delegation. This research underscores the nuanced strategies tribes employ to ensure self-determination and supports reevaluation of assimilation as a policy tool.

Journal of Political Institutions and Political EconomyVol. 5(2)
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.