Federal Incarceration and Native American Felon Disenfranchisement in the US West

When Native Americans are arrested for felonies on most reservations, they are under the legal authority of the federal government and federal sentencing laws. They are subject to a convoluted system of jurisdiction in which they are held and tried off-reservation in federal courts. We ask how federal criminal justice policies have contributed to voting disenfranchisement of Native Americans in Western states. We document the role of federal government policies in the sentencing of Native Americans in Western states with felon disenfranchisement laws. We show that the path to disenfranchisement in these states flows through the federal government, which imposes longer sentences than most states for equivalent crimes. Federal felons are not eligible for parole, a key point when voting rights are restored in most states. The jurisdictional challenges, legal ambiguities, and concerns with voting violations strongly discourage Native felons from voting after their sentences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000101
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Federal Incarceration and Native American Felon Disenfranchisement in the US West

Joseph Dietrich, Melissa Rogers, Jean Reith Schroedel
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Federal Incarceration and Native American Felon Disenfranchisement in the US West

Joseph Dietrich, Melissa Rogers, Jean Reith Schroedel
article en

Abstract

When Native Americans are arrested for felonies on most reservations, they are under the legal authority of the federal government and federal sentencing laws. They are subject to a convoluted system of jurisdiction in which they are held and tried off-reservation in federal courts. We ask how federal criminal justice policies have contributed to voting disenfranchisement of Native Americans in Western states. We document the role of federal government policies in the sentencing of Native Americans in Western states with felon disenfranchisement laws. We show that the path to disenfranchisement in these states flows through the federal government, which imposes longer sentences than most states for equivalent crimes. Federal felons are not eligible for parole, a key point when voting rights are restored in most states. The jurisdictional challenges, legal ambiguities, and concerns with voting violations strongly discourage Native felons from voting after their sentences.

Journal of Political Institutions and Political EconomyVol. 5(2)
Claremont Graduate University (US), Towson University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Federal Incarceration and Native American Felon Disenfranchisement in the US West — Joseph Dietrich, Melissa Rogers, et al. · Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS