Assessment of a hydrologic-land surface model to simulate thermo-hydrologic evolution of permafrost regions

• Permafrost hydrology is underexplored due to complex processes and scarce data. • We assessed varied parametrizations for thermo-hydrologic regimes of the sub-arctic. • Inconsistent streamflow and permafrost data challenge achieving a good model fit. • Attention to insulation from snow cover and soil organic matter is crucial. • An ensemble of carefully designed models can predict possible hydrologic behaviors. Hydrologic-land surface models (H-LSMs) offer a physically-based framework for representing and predicting the present and future states of the extensive high-latitude permafrost areas worldwide. Their primary challenge, however, is that soil temperature data are severely limited, and traditional model validation, based only on streamflow, can show the right fit to these data for the wrong reasons. Here, we address this challenge by (1) collecting existing data in various forms including in-situ borehole data and different large-scale permafrost maps in addition to streamflow data, (2) comprehensively evaluating the performance of an H-LSM with a wide range of possible process parametrizations and initializations, and (3) assessing possible trade-offs in model performance in concurrently representing hydrologic and permafrost dynamics, thereby pointing to the possible model deficiencies that require improvement. As a case study, we focus on the sub-arctic Liard River Basin in Canada, which typifies vast northern sporadic and discontinuous permafrost regions. Our findings reveal that different process parameterizations tend to align with different data sources or variables, which largely exhibit inconsistencies among themselves. We further observe that a model may fail to represent permafrost occurrence yet seemingly fit streamflows adequately. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that accurately representing essential permafrost dynamics, including the active soil layer and insulation effects from snow cover and soil organic matter, is crucial for developing high-fidelity models in these regions. Given the complexity of processes and the incompatibility among different data sources/variables, we conclude that employing an ensemble of carefully designed model parameterizations is essential to provide a reliable picture of the current conditions and future spatio-temporal co-evolution of hydrology and permafrost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132161
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of a hydrologic-land surface model to simulate thermo-hydrologic evolution of permafrost regions

Mohamed Elshamy, Saman Razavi, Mohamed S. Abdelhamed, H. S. Wheater
5 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Climate change and permafrost
1.88
article

Assessment of a hydrologic-land surface model to simulate thermo-hydrologic evolution of permafrost regions

Mohamed Elshamy, Saman Razavi, Mohamed S. Abdelhamed, H. S. Wheater
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Permafrost hydrology is underexplored due to complex processes and scarce data. • We assessed varied parametrizations for thermo-hydrologic regimes of the sub-arctic. • Inconsistent streamflow and permafrost data challenge achieving a good model fit. • Attention to insulation from snow cover and soil organic matter is crucial. • An ensemble of carefully designed models can predict possible hydrologic behaviors. Hydrologic-land surface models (H-LSMs) offer a physically-based framework for representing and predicting the present and future states of the extensive high-latitude permafrost areas worldwide. Their primary challenge, however, is that soil temperature data are severely limited, and traditional model validation, based only on streamflow, can show the right fit to these data for the wrong reasons. Here, we address this challenge by (1) collecting existing data in various forms including in-situ borehole data and different large-scale permafrost maps in addition to streamflow data, (2) comprehensively evaluating the performance of an H-LSM with a wide range of possible process parametrizations and initializations, and (3) assessing possible trade-offs in model performance in concurrently representing hydrologic and permafrost dynamics, thereby pointing to the possible model deficiencies that require improvement. As a case study, we focus on the sub-arctic Liard River Basin in Canada, which typifies vast northern sporadic and discontinuous permafrost regions. Our findings reveal that different process parameterizations tend to align with different data sources or variables, which largely exhibit inconsistencies among themselves. We further observe that a model may fail to represent permafrost occurrence yet seemingly fit streamflows adequately. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that accurately representing essential permafrost dynamics, including the active soil layer and insulation effects from snow cover and soil organic matter, is crucial for developing high-fidelity models in these regions. Given the complexity of processes and the incompatibility among different data sources/variables, we conclude that employing an ensemble of carefully designed model parameterizations is essential to provide a reliable picture of the current conditions and future spatio-temporal co-evolution of hydrology and permafrost.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 645
Cairo University (EG), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Global Institute for Water Security (CA), Imperial College London (GB)
University of Saskatchewan, Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Global Water Futures
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Climate change and permafrost
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.