Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Disproportionately negative pandemic outcomes, lack of race-based data collection and poor engagement of Black communities in policy decision making have been widely documented for Black Canadians. We examine this to understand how formal public engagement processes might be more inclusive of Black peoples to inform more responsive policies. METHODS: The study employed an asset-based lens to examine how Black communities have engaged in health policy and advocacy in Ontario. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight participants who self-identify as Black, recruited using purposive and intensity sampling to (1) identify information-rich cases, including people who have been at the forefront of high-impact work in this space and (2) participants whose mission and mandates represented diverse approaches and sub-populations. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that while Black community advocates face systemic and contextual barriers, they also embody deep and multifaceted knowledge, training and experience, which inform the rich ways that they approach advocacy. DISCUSSION: Despite its Ontario focus, this study adds breadth and depth to the existing literature on health policy and historically marginalized populations, offering broader lessons for policy makers across jurisdictions. Our findings encourage policy makers to better recognize, make space for and cultivate fertile advocacy foundations, cultural knowledge and community-driven systems already present in Black communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare policy
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2024.27413
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up

R George, A. Abebe
2 citations
Healthcare policy
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
1.70
article

Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up

R George, A. Abebe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Disproportionately negative pandemic outcomes, lack of race-based data collection and poor engagement of Black communities in policy decision making have been widely documented for Black Canadians. We examine this to understand how formal public engagement processes might be more inclusive of Black peoples to inform more responsive policies. METHODS: The study employed an asset-based lens to examine how Black communities have engaged in health policy and advocacy in Ontario. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight participants who self-identify as Black, recruited using purposive and intensity sampling to (1) identify information-rich cases, including people who have been at the forefront of high-impact work in this space and (2) participants whose mission and mandates represented diverse approaches and sub-populations. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that while Black community advocates face systemic and contextual barriers, they also embody deep and multifaceted knowledge, training and experience, which inform the rich ways that they approach advocacy. DISCUSSION: Despite its Ontario focus, this study adds breadth and depth to the existing literature on health policy and historically marginalized populations, offering broader lessons for policy makers across jurisdictions. Our findings encourage policy makers to better recognize, make space for and cultivate fertile advocacy foundations, cultural knowledge and community-driven systems already present in Black communities.

Healthcare policyVol. 20(SP)
University of Guelph (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.