Rethinking Field School Delivery and Addressing Our Biases

Abstract Field schools are foundational training for archaeologists and the corresponding methods for instruction are largely consistent within the discipline. The expectation is that at some point early in their careers students will enroll in a field school. To participate, students must pay summer tuition, dedicate a minimum of four weeks (usually longer) to full-time fieldwork, and in many cases travel to remote locations. The reality is that for many students such expectations make field school participation an impossibility—and ultimately make archaeology a nonviable career option for students from historically underrepresented backgrounds. Offering local field opportunities within the context of a regular school year alleviates those problems. A recent field school in north Idaho demonstrated how traditional field school structure excludes many students and how archaeologists can adjust instruction to make field training more accessible to students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2024.20
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Field School Delivery and Addressing Our Biases

Katrina C. L. Eichner, Renae J. Campbell, Mark Warner
2 citations
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
2.68
article

Rethinking Field School Delivery and Addressing Our Biases

Katrina C. L. Eichner, Renae J. Campbell, Mark Warner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Field schools are foundational training for archaeologists and the corresponding methods for instruction are largely consistent within the discipline. The expectation is that at some point early in their careers students will enroll in a field school. To participate, students must pay summer tuition, dedicate a minimum of four weeks (usually longer) to full-time fieldwork, and in many cases travel to remote locations. The reality is that for many students such expectations make field school participation an impossibility—and ultimately make archaeology a nonviable career option for students from historically underrepresented backgrounds. Offering local field opportunities within the context of a regular school year alleviates those problems. A recent field school in north Idaho demonstrated how traditional field school structure excludes many students and how archaeologists can adjust instruction to make field training more accessible to students.

Advances in Archaeological PracticeVol. 12(4)
University of Idaho (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
2.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.