Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems

The question of the concrete design of a fair and efficient governance framework to ensure responsible technology development and implementation concerns not only high-risk artificial intelligence systems. Everyday applications with a limited ability to inflict harm are also addressed. This article examines the European Union's approach to regulating these non-high-risk systems. We focus on the governance model for these systems established by the Artificial Intelligence Act. Based on a doctrinal legal reconstruction of the rules for codes of conduct and considering the European Union's stated goal of achieving a market-oriented balance between innovation, fundamental rights, and public interest, we explore our topic from three different perspectives: an analysis of specific regulatory components of the governance mechanism is followed by a reflection on ethics and trustworthiness implications of the EU´s approach and concluded by an analysis of a case study from an NLP-based, language-simplifying artificial intelligence application for assistive purposes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Internet Policy Review
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1797
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems

Thorben Schomacker, Marina Tropmann-Frick, Michael Gille
6 citations
Internet Policy Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
3.16
article

Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems

Thorben Schomacker, Marina Tropmann-Frick, Michael Gille
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The question of the concrete design of a fair and efficient governance framework to ensure responsible technology development and implementation concerns not only high-risk artificial intelligence systems. Everyday applications with a limited ability to inflict harm are also addressed. This article examines the European Union's approach to regulating these non-high-risk systems. We focus on the governance model for these systems established by the Artificial Intelligence Act. Based on a doctrinal legal reconstruction of the rules for codes of conduct and considering the European Union's stated goal of achieving a market-oriented balance between innovation, fundamental rights, and public interest, we explore our topic from three different perspectives: an analysis of specific regulatory components of the governance mechanism is followed by a reflection on ethics and trustworthiness implications of the EU´s approach and concluded by an analysis of a case study from an NLP-based, language-simplifying artificial intelligence application for assistive purposes.

Internet Policy ReviewVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
3.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.