Interpretable machine‐learning models for predicting creep recovery of concrete

Abstract Creep recovery of concrete is essential for accurately assessing the performance of concrete structures over service time. Existing creep recovery models exhibit low accuracy, and the influencing factors of creep recovery remain inadequately elucidated. In this paper, interpretable machine learning (ML) techniques were employed to develop a prediction model for concrete creep recovery. Several ML techniques were selected including random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM). In order to maximize the sample size of the dataset, 109 sets of creep recovery data were collected from existing literatures for model training. Feature selection is utilized to determine the input parameters for ML models, and 12 input variables were selected. The model is fine‐tuned using Bayesian optimization techniques. To ensure the reliability of ML models, 10‐fold cross‐validation and random data splitting were implemented. The results indicate that the ML models exhibited higher accuracy compared to the existing creep recovery model. Among these ML models, LGBM demonstrated superior accuracy, efficiency and stability (with R 2 = 0.993, 0.978, and 0.973 for the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret the significance of each input parameter on ML model prediction. Duration after unloading, stress magnitude, and ambient relative humidity were the main feature variables influencing concrete creep recovery. Upon comparing the influencing factors, it was discerned that there exists a distinct difference between creep and creep recovery of concrete.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400406
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretable machine‐learning models for predicting creep recovery of concrete

Xufeng Li, Shengqi Mei, Xingju Wang, Xiaodong Liu
2 citations
Structural Concrete
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
0.52
article

Interpretable machine‐learning models for predicting creep recovery of concrete

Xufeng Li, Shengqi Mei, Xingju Wang, Xiaodong Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Creep recovery of concrete is essential for accurately assessing the performance of concrete structures over service time. Existing creep recovery models exhibit low accuracy, and the influencing factors of creep recovery remain inadequately elucidated. In this paper, interpretable machine learning (ML) techniques were employed to develop a prediction model for concrete creep recovery. Several ML techniques were selected including random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM). In order to maximize the sample size of the dataset, 109 sets of creep recovery data were collected from existing literatures for model training. Feature selection is utilized to determine the input parameters for ML models, and 12 input variables were selected. The model is fine‐tuned using Bayesian optimization techniques. To ensure the reliability of ML models, 10‐fold cross‐validation and random data splitting were implemented. The results indicate that the ML models exhibited higher accuracy compared to the existing creep recovery model. Among these ML models, LGBM demonstrated superior accuracy, efficiency and stability (with R 2 = 0.993, 0.978, and 0.973 for the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret the significance of each input parameter on ML model prediction. Duration after unloading, stress magnitude, and ambient relative humidity were the main feature variables influencing concrete creep recovery. Upon comparing the influencing factors, it was discerned that there exists a distinct difference between creep and creep recovery of concrete.

Structural ConcreteVol. 26(2)
Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interpretable machine‐learning models for predicting creep recovery of concrete — Xufeng Li, Shengqi Mei, et al. · Structural Concrete (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS