Public Pension Funds in EU Member States: Their Comparability and Tax Treatment under the Free Movement of Capital (Keva and Others (Case C-39/23))

This note examines the tax treatment of public pension funds within the European Union in the context of the free movement of capital as contained in article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The note analyses recent developments regarding the imposition, by EU Member States, of withholding taxes on dividends received by non-resident public pension funds in circumstances in which resident public pension funds are exempt. In doing so, the article critiques the actual comparability of these situations. It underscores the limitations of article 65(1)(a) of the TFEU, which theoretically permits tax differentiation based on residence. Furthermore, the article highlights the crucial role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in ensuring that Member States comply with EU law, particularly in order to maintain a genuine internal market for cross-border investments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Taxation
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/37tt4vb
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Pension Funds in EU Member States: Their Comparability and Tax Treatment under the Free Movement of Capital (Keva and Others (Case C-39/23))

Graham Butler
European Taxation
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Public Pension Funds in EU Member States: Their Comparability and Tax Treatment under the Free Movement of Capital (Keva and Others (Case C-39/23))

Graham Butler
article en

Abstract

This note examines the tax treatment of public pension funds within the European Union in the context of the free movement of capital as contained in article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The note analyses recent developments regarding the imposition, by EU Member States, of withholding taxes on dividends received by non-resident public pension funds in circumstances in which resident public pension funds are exempt. In doing so, the article critiques the actual comparability of these situations. It underscores the limitations of article 65(1)(a) of the TFEU, which theoretically permits tax differentiation based on residence. Furthermore, the article highlights the crucial role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in ensuring that Member States comply with EU law, particularly in order to maintain a genuine internal market for cross-border investments.

European TaxationVol. 64(11)
Department of Social Sciences (RU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public Pension Funds in EU Member States: Their Comparability and Tax Treatment under the Free Movement of Capital (Keva and Others (Case C-39/23)) — Graham Butler · European Taxation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS