A positive ReceptivaDx result for BCL6 does not correlate with abnormal ERA results or decreased expression of receptivity-associated markers: two sides of the endometrial receptivity coin in fertility evaluation and treatment

A positive ReceptivaDx BCL6 result does not correlate with a prereceptive ERA. Epithelial cells from BCL6-positive endometrium did not show significantly decreased expression in most of the receptivity markers evaluated. These findings demonstrate discordance between the interpretation of "endometrial receptivity" by ReceptivaDx and ERA, and highlight the need for further validation of endometrial evaluation methods in fertility treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F&S Science
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfss.2024.10.005
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A positive ReceptivaDx result for BCL6 does not correlate with abnormal ERA results or decreased expression of receptivity-associated markers: two sides of the endometrial receptivity coin in fertility evaluation and treatment

Ana Almonte-Loya, Hakan Cakmak, Linda C. Giudice, Meagan Chan et al.
2 citations
F&S Science
Ovarian function and disorders
1.07
article

A positive ReceptivaDx result for BCL6 does not correlate with abnormal ERA results or decreased expression of receptivity-associated markers: two sides of the endometrial receptivity coin in fertility evaluation and treatment

Ana Almonte-Loya, Hakan Cakmak, Linda C. Giudice, Meagan Chan, David Huang, Emily Flynn, Juan C. Irwin, Brittany Davidson, Marcelle Ivonne Cedars, Alexis J. Combes, Marina Sirota, Gabriela K. Fragiadakis, Amber Casillas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A positive ReceptivaDx BCL6 result does not correlate with a prereceptive ERA. Epithelial cells from BCL6-positive endometrium did not show significantly decreased expression in most of the receptivity markers evaluated. These findings demonstrate discordance between the interpretation of "endometrial receptivity" by ReceptivaDx and ERA, and highlight the need for further validation of endometrial evaluation methods in fertility treatment.

F&S ScienceVol. 6(1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California System (US), Reproductive Science Center (US), University of San Francisco (US)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ovarian function and disorders
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A positive ReceptivaDx result for BCL6 does not correlate with abnormal ERA results or decreased expression of receptivity-associated markers: two sides of the endometrial receptivity coin in fertility evaluation and treatment — Ana Almonte-Loya, Hakan Cakmak, et al. · F&S Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS