Evidence-based strategies for optimizing long-term temperature monitoring in offices

Long-term monitoring of the thermal environment in office buildings has become increasingly relevant with the rise of wireless sensor networks. However, there is a notable absence of explicit guidelines for implementing monitoring strategies in such contexts. This lack of direction can lead to inconsistent deployment of sensor networks, resulting in higher maintenance costs and inaccurate long-term assessments of thermal conditions. Based on data analyses of high-accuracy, high-frequency field measurements conducted over a year or longer across multiple offices in Sydney and Shanghai, this study proposes a strategy for long-term temperature monitoring. The strategy advises practitioners to prioritize considerations such as air-conditioning type, room size, and space function when selecting "representative" sensor locations. Typically, sampling every 30 min is deemed adequate for shared offices where an error margin of ±0.5°C is acceptable. For environments with stable indoor temperatures, less frequent sampling intervals suffice. A power regression model tailored for offices equipped with central AC and no operable windows was developed to predict the maximum allowable sampling interval based on several days of indoor temperature monitoring in winter. Regarding monitoring duration, the study advocates a preferred sampling period of one year to comprehensively capture seasonal variations. Alternatively, a minimum monitoring period of four to six months commencing in late spring or early summer is identified as potentially sufficient. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing long-term thermal monitoring practices in offices and may contribute to expanding the scope of thermal comfort standards. • Conducted spatial and temporal analyses using year-long, high-frequency field data. • Optimized strategy for sensor locating, sampling interval, and monitoring period. • A 30-minute interval with high-accuracy sensors is sufficient for shared offices. • Proposed a predictive model to determine the maximum allowable sampling interval. • A minimum period of 4–6 months starting in late spring is potentially sufficient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indoor Environments
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100059
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-based strategies for optimizing long-term temperature monitoring in offices

Peixian Li, Siyan Wang, Richard de Dear, Thomas Parkinson et al.
2 citations
Indoor Environments
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
0.53
article

Evidence-based strategies for optimizing long-term temperature monitoring in offices

Peixian Li, Siyan Wang, Richard de Dear, Thomas Parkinson, Xiangjun Zhao, Xing Shi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Long-term monitoring of the thermal environment in office buildings has become increasingly relevant with the rise of wireless sensor networks. However, there is a notable absence of explicit guidelines for implementing monitoring strategies in such contexts. This lack of direction can lead to inconsistent deployment of sensor networks, resulting in higher maintenance costs and inaccurate long-term assessments of thermal conditions. Based on data analyses of high-accuracy, high-frequency field measurements conducted over a year or longer across multiple offices in Sydney and Shanghai, this study proposes a strategy for long-term temperature monitoring. The strategy advises practitioners to prioritize considerations such as air-conditioning type, room size, and space function when selecting "representative" sensor locations. Typically, sampling every 30 min is deemed adequate for shared offices where an error margin of ±0.5°C is acceptable. For environments with stable indoor temperatures, less frequent sampling intervals suffice. A power regression model tailored for offices equipped with central AC and no operable windows was developed to predict the maximum allowable sampling interval based on several days of indoor temperature monitoring in winter. Regarding monitoring duration, the study advocates a preferred sampling period of one year to comprehensively capture seasonal variations. Alternatively, a minimum monitoring period of four to six months commencing in late spring or early summer is identified as potentially sufficient. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing long-term thermal monitoring practices in offices and may contribute to expanding the scope of thermal comfort standards. • Conducted spatial and temporal analyses using year-long, high-frequency field data. • Optimized strategy for sensor locating, sampling interval, and monitoring period. • A 30-minute interval with high-accuracy sensors is sufficient for shared offices. • Proposed a predictive model to determine the maximum allowable sampling interval. • A minimum period of 4–6 months starting in late spring is potentially sufficient.

Indoor EnvironmentsVol. 1(4)
Tongji University (CN), The University of Sydney (AU), Faculty of Design (SI), Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.