Birth weight following frozen versus fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

Objective.Birth weight is an outcome to evaluate the safety of assisted reproductive technology.The objective of this study was to compare the effect of frozen versus fresh embryo transfer on newborn birth weight. Patients and Methods.In the infertility department of a teaching hospital affiliated with a university of medical sciences, we performed a retrospective cohort study.Eligible women were 18 years old and conceived a singleton pregnancy ( 22 weeks or 500 g) with either frozen or fresh embryo transfer.None of the patients had diabetes, hypertension.We recorded maternal characteristics, newborn features, and perinatal outcomes.Results.In total, 116 eligible patients with a mean (SD) age of 32.7 (5.8) years and a mean body mass index of 25.6 (2.5) were included.Of these, 84 had a frozen and 32 had a fresh embryo transfer.Mean birth weights were 3,050.7 (587.6) and 2,983.6 (423.5) in the frozen and fresh embryo transfer groups, respectively (p = 0.568).However, after adjusting for confounding factors, including maternal age, gravidity, body mass index, fasting blood sugar, blood pressure, and gestational age, the difference in birth weight was statistically significant [b = 230.8(103.6), p = 0.003].There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the percentages of low birth weight, small or large for gestational age, preterm, stillbirth, or intra-uterine foetal death singletons.Conclusions.Frozen embryo transfer results in higher birth weight compared to fresh embryo transfer.This difference was statistically significant despite similar perinatal outcomes, warranting further investigation into underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36129/jog.2024.189
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Birth weight following frozen versus fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

Aghdas Safari, Bahareh Khakifirooz, S Mohammadian
Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Birth weight following frozen versus fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

Aghdas Safari, Bahareh Khakifirooz, S Mohammadian
article en

Abstract

Objective.Birth weight is an outcome to evaluate the safety of assisted reproductive technology.The objective of this study was to compare the effect of frozen versus fresh embryo transfer on newborn birth weight. Patients and Methods.In the infertility department of a teaching hospital affiliated with a university of medical sciences, we performed a retrospective cohort study.Eligible women were 18 years old and conceived a singleton pregnancy ( 22 weeks or 500 g) with either frozen or fresh embryo transfer.None of the patients had diabetes, hypertension.We recorded maternal characteristics, newborn features, and perinatal outcomes.Results.In total, 116 eligible patients with a mean (SD) age of 32.7 (5.8) years and a mean body mass index of 25.6 (2.5) were included.Of these, 84 had a frozen and 32 had a fresh embryo transfer.Mean birth weights were 3,050.7 (587.6) and 2,983.6 (423.5) in the frozen and fresh embryo transfer groups, respectively (p = 0.568).However, after adjusting for confounding factors, including maternal age, gravidity, body mass index, fasting blood sugar, blood pressure, and gestational age, the difference in birth weight was statistically significant [b = 230.8(103.6), p = 0.003].There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the percentages of low birth weight, small or large for gestational age, preterm, stillbirth, or intra-uterine foetal death singletons.Conclusions.Frozen embryo transfer results in higher birth weight compared to fresh embryo transfer.This difference was statistically significant despite similar perinatal outcomes, warranting further investigation into underlying mechanisms.

Italian Journal of Gynaecology and ObstetricsVol. 37(01)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.