Predictions of Peak Discharge of Dam Failures Based on the Combined GA and BP Neural Networks

In this paper, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was utilized to predict the peak discharge of dam failures, which was based on the combined Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Back Propagation (BP) neural network. The dataset comprises 40 samples from self-conducted experiments and available literature. To compare the efficiency of the suggested approach, three evaluation metrics, including the coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE), were analyzed for both the BP neural network and the GA-BP neural network. The findings suggest that (1) The prediction accuracy of the GA-BP was better than that of the BP; and (2) Compared to BP, GA-BP demonstrated a 9.07% average improvement in R2, a 57.36% average reduction in MAE, and a 57.53% average reduction in RMSE. In addition, the results of GA-BP and semi-empirical formulas were compared and the effect of three parameters on the peak discharge was analyzed. The results showed that the GA-BP model could effectively predict the peak discharge of dam failures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202946
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Dam Engineering and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictions of Peak Discharge of Dam Failures Based on the Combined GA and BP Neural Networks

Lv Ren, Xiaohua Dong, Haiyan Wu, Jie Liu et al.
5 citations
Water
Dam Engineering and Safety
1.30
article

Predictions of Peak Discharge of Dam Failures Based on the Combined GA and BP Neural Networks

Lv Ren, Xiaohua Dong, Haiyan Wu, Jie Liu, Changyuan Fan, Xin Jin, Yuan Tao
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In this paper, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was utilized to predict the peak discharge of dam failures, which was based on the combined Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Back Propagation (BP) neural network. The dataset comprises 40 samples from self-conducted experiments and available literature. To compare the efficiency of the suggested approach, three evaluation metrics, including the coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE), were analyzed for both the BP neural network and the GA-BP neural network. The findings suggest that (1) The prediction accuracy of the GA-BP was better than that of the BP; and (2) Compared to BP, GA-BP demonstrated a 9.07% average improvement in R2, a 57.36% average reduction in MAE, and a 57.53% average reduction in RMSE. In addition, the results of GA-BP and semi-empirical formulas were compared and the effect of three parameters on the peak discharge was analyzed. The results showed that the GA-BP model could effectively predict the peak discharge of dam failures.

WaterVol. 16(20)
China Three Gorges University (CN), Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), Beijing Solar Energy Research Institute (CN), Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dam Engineering and Safety
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predictions of Peak Discharge of Dam Failures Based on the Combined GA and BP Neural Networks — Lv Ren, Xiaohua Dong, et al. · Water (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS