Gatekeeper™ Prostheses Implants in the Anal Canal for Gas Incontinence and Soiling: Long-Term Follow-Up

<b>Introduction</b>: Although several treatments for faecal incontinence are available, gas incontinence (GI) and soiling are difficult to manage. The aim of this study is to evaluate Gatekeeper™ for this subtype of faecal incontinence. <b>Methods</b>: Prospective single-centre case series. Patients with mainly soiling and/or GI were treated with polyacrylonitrile prostheses. An evaluation was performed with a 3-week continence diary. St. Mark's score and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to study the patient's continence perception and surgical satisfaction, at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. 3D-Endoanal Ultrasound and Anorectal Manometry were performed at baseline and postoperatively. <b>Results</b>: A total of 13 patients were enrolled (11 women), aged (median (IQR)) 62 (13) years, and all implants were uneventful. A significant reduction in soiling and GI episodes was documented at 1 year, 7 (18) baseline days of soiling/3 weeks vs. 2 (4) (<i>p</i> = 0.002); 13 (13) baseline episodes of GI/3 weeks vs. 4 (10) (<i>p</i> = 0.01). This improvement was correlated with a significant increase in VAS (0-10), 3 (2, 5) baseline vs. 7 (1, 5) (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and maintained throughout the follow-up. There was complete remission or significant improvement defined as >70% reduction in gas and soiling days in 6 patients at 2 years follow-up. Soiling episodes were reduced ≥70% in 8/11 patients (72.7%). Nine (70%) patients would repeat the treatment. <b>Conclusions</b>: Gatekeeper™ is a safe, minimally invasive treatment for soiling and GI. A significant reduction in soiling and GI was observed in our series, with a better response to soiling. Most of the patients would repeat the treatment. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings in this subgroup of FI patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206156
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gatekeeper™ Prostheses Implants in the Anal Canal for Gas Incontinence and Soiling: Long-Term Follow-Up

Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos, Laura Lagares‐Tena, Jaume Tur-Martínez, Juan Hinojosa et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Gatekeeper™ Prostheses Implants in the Anal Canal for Gas Incontinence and Soiling: Long-Term Follow-Up

Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos, Laura Lagares‐Tena, Jaume Tur-Martínez, Juan Hinojosa, Antonio Arroyo, Albert Navarro-Luna
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Although several treatments for faecal incontinence are available, gas incontinence (GI) and soiling are difficult to manage. The aim of this study is to evaluate Gatekeeper™ for this subtype of faecal incontinence. <b>Methods</b>: Prospective single-centre case series. Patients with mainly soiling and/or GI were treated with polyacrylonitrile prostheses. An evaluation was performed with a 3-week continence diary. St. Mark's score and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to study the patient's continence perception and surgical satisfaction, at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. 3D-Endoanal Ultrasound and Anorectal Manometry were performed at baseline and postoperatively. <b>Results</b>: A total of 13 patients were enrolled (11 women), aged (median (IQR)) 62 (13) years, and all implants were uneventful. A significant reduction in soiling and GI episodes was documented at 1 year, 7 (18) baseline days of soiling/3 weeks vs. 2 (4) (<i>p</i> = 0.002); 13 (13) baseline episodes of GI/3 weeks vs. 4 (10) (<i>p</i> = 0.01). This improvement was correlated with a significant increase in VAS (0-10), 3 (2, 5) baseline vs. 7 (1, 5) (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and maintained throughout the follow-up. There was complete remission or significant improvement defined as >70% reduction in gas and soiling days in 6 patients at 2 years follow-up. Soiling episodes were reduced ≥70% in 8/11 patients (72.7%). Nine (70%) patients would repeat the treatment. <b>Conclusions</b>: Gatekeeper™ is a safe, minimally invasive treatment for soiling and GI. A significant reduction in soiling and GI was observed in our series, with a better response to soiling. Most of the patients would repeat the treatment. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings in this subgroup of FI patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(20)
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Mútua Terrassa (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.