Acoustic signature of plastic marine debris mimics the prey items of deep-diving cetaceans

It is largely assumed that odontocetes voluntarily ingest plastic marine debris because they visually mistake it for prey. However, deep-diving whales do not rely on visual systems to forage and instead employ echolocation. Whether or not these whales misinterpret acoustic signals that lead to the accidental ingestion of plastic is unknown. We examined this question by measuring the target strength of prey items (squid, squid beaks) and various naturally weathered and fouled plastics sourced from the North Carolina coastline in situ at sea at 38, 70 and 120 kHz. Here we show that 100 % of plastic marine debris tested (plastics commonly found in the stomachs of stranded whales such as plastic bags, rope, and bottles) have either similar or stronger acoustic target strengths compared with that of whale prey items. These finding supports the hypothesis that consumption of plastic by deep-diving odontocetes is driven by a misperception of acoustic signals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117069
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acoustic signature of plastic marine debris mimics the prey items of deep-diving cetaceans

Greg B. Merrill, Elisabetta Menini, Joanna Matheson, Zachary T. Swaim et al.
5 citations
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.66
article

Acoustic signature of plastic marine debris mimics the prey items of deep-diving cetaceans

Greg B. Merrill, Elisabetta Menini, Joanna Matheson, Zachary T. Swaim, Stefan G. Kuhlman, Lei Shi, S. H. Goh, A. L. Bishop, DP Nowacek, I G Benaka, Nicholas A. Kaney
article en
5 citations

Abstract

It is largely assumed that odontocetes voluntarily ingest plastic marine debris because they visually mistake it for prey. However, deep-diving whales do not rely on visual systems to forage and instead employ echolocation. Whether or not these whales misinterpret acoustic signals that lead to the accidental ingestion of plastic is unknown. We examined this question by measuring the target strength of prey items (squid, squid beaks) and various naturally weathered and fouled plastics sourced from the North Carolina coastline in situ at sea at 38, 70 and 120 kHz. Here we show that 100 % of plastic marine debris tested (plastics commonly found in the stomachs of stranded whales such as plastic bags, rope, and bottles) have either similar or stronger acoustic target strengths compared with that of whale prey items. These finding supports the hypothesis that consumption of plastic by deep-diving odontocetes is driven by a misperception of acoustic signals.

Marine Pollution BulletinVol. 209(Pt A)
Duke University (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.