Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs

Abstract Faculty perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education are crucial for AI’s meaningful integration into teaching and learning, yet research is scarce. This paper presents a study designed to gain insight into faculty members’ ( N = 122) AI self-efficacy and distinct latent profiles, perceived benefits, challenges, use, and professional development needs related to AI. The respondents saw greater equity in education as AI’s greatest benefit, while students and faculty members’ lack of AI literacy was among the greatest challenges, with the majority interested in professional development. Latent class analysis revealed four distinct faculty member profiles: optimistic, critical, critically reflected, and neutral. The optimistic profile moderates the relationship between self-efficacy and usage. The development of adequate support services is suggested for successful and sustainable digital transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
Citations
86
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs

Dana-Kristin Mah
86 citations
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Online Learning and Analytics
35.42
article

Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs

Dana-Kristin Mah
article en
86 citations

Abstract

Abstract Faculty perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education are crucial for AI’s meaningful integration into teaching and learning, yet research is scarce. This paper presents a study designed to gain insight into faculty members’ ( N = 122) AI self-efficacy and distinct latent profiles, perceived benefits, challenges, use, and professional development needs related to AI. The respondents saw greater equity in education as AI’s greatest benefit, while students and faculty members’ lack of AI literacy was among the greatest challenges, with the majority interested in professional development. Latent class analysis revealed four distinct faculty member profiles: optimistic, critical, critically reflected, and neutral. The optimistic profile moderates the relationship between self-efficacy and usage. The development of adequate support services is suggested for successful and sustainable digital transformation.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher EducationVol. 21(1)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Online Learning and Analytics
35.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.