Examining the connection between resourcefulness and resilience: Analysis of UK rural SME firm-level enterprise characteristics

The ability of rural enterprises to withstand external shocks has been examined at regional and sectoral levels using extensive evidence bases. However, little is known of rural SMEs' resourcefulness and how this can affect their resilience. Rural SMEs have been exposed to severe operational disruptions in the face of recent internal and external shocks caused by turbulent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis suggests SME resilience is not sector-wide and depends on enterprises' behaviour, entrepreneurial activity and ability to manage existing resources: a process generally known as ‘bricolage’. This paper examines the connection between resourcefulness of rural SMEs and their resilience capacity. Data from an extensive cross-sectional survey of rural SMEs in the UK was used in a multivariate analysis to create a typology of rural SMEs based on resourcefulness measured by behaviours such as social networking. Rural SME enterprise types are then compared against variables indicating resilient performance during the pandemic. Four rural SME enterprise types emerge from the analysis, each with different strategic behaviours and resilience performance attributes. The typology underscores the importance of resourcefulness in SME resilience and argues that resilience goes beyond regional or sectoral contexts and has to do with idiosyncratic features and individual characteristics. The analysis emphasises the importance of supporting and enhancing resourcefulness capabilities in resilience planning and provides a valuable baseline for further in-depth research on understanding rural SMEs' ability to be resilient in times of crisis. • The paper draws on an analysis of the resilience of rural businesses during disruptive events like the COVID-19 pandemic. • A typology of rural SMEs based on firm-level characteristics was created using a multivariate analysis framework. • The paper examines the relationship between the resourcefulness of rural SMEs and their ability to build resilience. • Four types of rural business are identified, each with different strategic behaviour and resilience attributes. • It highlights the importance of supporting and enhancing resource and risk planning in firm-level resilience thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103450
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the connection between resourcefulness and resilience: Analysis of UK rural SME firm-level enterprise characteristics

Damian Maye, Evgenia Micha, Fahimeh Malekinezhad
7 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Regional resilience and development
7.90
article

Examining the connection between resourcefulness and resilience: Analysis of UK rural SME firm-level enterprise characteristics

Damian Maye, Evgenia Micha, Fahimeh Malekinezhad
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The ability of rural enterprises to withstand external shocks has been examined at regional and sectoral levels using extensive evidence bases. However, little is known of rural SMEs' resourcefulness and how this can affect their resilience. Rural SMEs have been exposed to severe operational disruptions in the face of recent internal and external shocks caused by turbulent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis suggests SME resilience is not sector-wide and depends on enterprises' behaviour, entrepreneurial activity and ability to manage existing resources: a process generally known as ‘bricolage’. This paper examines the connection between resourcefulness of rural SMEs and their resilience capacity. Data from an extensive cross-sectional survey of rural SMEs in the UK was used in a multivariate analysis to create a typology of rural SMEs based on resourcefulness measured by behaviours such as social networking. Rural SME enterprise types are then compared against variables indicating resilient performance during the pandemic. Four rural SME enterprise types emerge from the analysis, each with different strategic behaviours and resilience performance attributes. The typology underscores the importance of resourcefulness in SME resilience and argues that resilience goes beyond regional or sectoral contexts and has to do with idiosyncratic features and individual characteristics. The analysis emphasises the importance of supporting and enhancing resourcefulness capabilities in resilience planning and provides a valuable baseline for further in-depth research on understanding rural SMEs' ability to be resilient in times of crisis. • The paper draws on an analysis of the resilience of rural businesses during disruptive events like the COVID-19 pandemic. • A typology of rural SMEs based on firm-level characteristics was created using a multivariate analysis framework. • The paper examines the relationship between the resourcefulness of rural SMEs and their ability to build resilience. • Four types of rural business are identified, each with different strategic behaviour and resilience attributes. • It highlights the importance of supporting and enhancing resource and risk planning in firm-level resilience thinking.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 112
University of Gloucestershire (GB), Countryside and Community Research Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Regional resilience and development
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.