Does the introduction of the acuity circle policy change split liver transplantation practice?

With the acuity circles (AC) policy aiming to reduce disparities in liver transplantation (LT) access, the allocation of high-quality grafts has shifted, potentially affecting the use and outcomes of split LT. Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (February 4, 2016, to February 3, 2024) were analyzed, including 1470 candidates who underwent deceased donor split LT, with 681 adult and 789 pediatric cases. The study periods were divided into pre-AC (February 4, 2016, to February 3, 2020) and post-AC (February 4, 2020, to February 3, 2024). The study assessed changes in split LT volumes and examined the impact of center practices. Both adult and pediatric split LTs decreased in the initial 3 years after the policy change, followed by an increase in the final year, with an overall 11.9% and 13.9% decrease between the eras. Adult female split LT cases remained consistent, ensuring access for smaller recipients. High-quality "splittable" livers were increasingly allocated to high MELD patients (MELD-Na ≥30). Despite the overall decrease in case volume, adult split LT volume increased in newly active living donor liver transplantation centers, with 6 centers increasing living donor liver transplantation volume by over 50.0%. Pediatric split LT volumes decreased despite additional priorities for pediatric candidates. The number of split LTs decreased in the initial period after the AC policy introduction, but there was a consistent need for small female candidates. In the adult population, living donor liver transplantation and split LT demonstrated a synergistic effect in boosting center transplant volumes, potentially improving access for female candidates who need small grafts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000000513
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the introduction of the acuity circle policy change split liver transplantation practice?

Toshihiro Nakayama, Carlos O. Esquivel, Kazunari Sasaki, Yuki Imaoka et al.
7 citations
Liver Transplantation
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
4.01
article

Does the introduction of the acuity circle policy change split liver transplantation practice?

Toshihiro Nakayama, Carlos O. Esquivel, Kazunari Sasaki, Yuki Imaoka, Miho Akabane, Marc L. Melcher
article en
7 citations

Abstract

With the acuity circles (AC) policy aiming to reduce disparities in liver transplantation (LT) access, the allocation of high-quality grafts has shifted, potentially affecting the use and outcomes of split LT. Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (February 4, 2016, to February 3, 2024) were analyzed, including 1470 candidates who underwent deceased donor split LT, with 681 adult and 789 pediatric cases. The study periods were divided into pre-AC (February 4, 2016, to February 3, 2020) and post-AC (February 4, 2020, to February 3, 2024). The study assessed changes in split LT volumes and examined the impact of center practices. Both adult and pediatric split LTs decreased in the initial 3 years after the policy change, followed by an increase in the final year, with an overall 11.9% and 13.9% decrease between the eras. Adult female split LT cases remained consistent, ensuring access for smaller recipients. High-quality "splittable" livers were increasingly allocated to high MELD patients (MELD-Na ≥30). Despite the overall decrease in case volume, adult split LT volume increased in newly active living donor liver transplantation centers, with 6 centers increasing living donor liver transplantation volume by over 50.0%. Pediatric split LT volumes decreased despite additional priorities for pediatric candidates. The number of split LTs decreased in the initial period after the AC policy introduction, but there was a consistent need for small female candidates. In the adult population, living donor liver transplantation and split LT demonstrated a synergistic effect in boosting center transplant volumes, potentially improving access for female candidates who need small grafts.

Liver TransplantationVol. 31(8)
Geological Society of America (US), Stanford Medicine (US), European Society for Organ Transplantation (IT), Artistic Realization Technologies (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.