Root traits of soybeans exposed to polyethylene films, polypropylene fragments, and biosolids

Biosolid use imports microplastics into the rhizosphere where they may interfere with root-soil-microbial interactions and cause morphological adaptations in crop root systems. Few studies have examined the response of crop roots to microplastics at documented soil concentrations, and many studies collect root traits using destructive techniques. Hence, there is little information on when and how microplastics effect the physical structure of root systems. Using the rhizobox method, soybeans (Glycine max) were grown in soil amended with biosolid microplastic mimics (polyethylene film or polypropylene fragments at 2,000 and 15,000 particles/kg dry soil) or biosolids and imaged weekly until maturity (11 weeks) using a custom scanner system. Plant biomass increased in the polyethylene treatments and decreased in the high concentration polypropylene treatment. Relative to the Control, polyethylene treatments had larger root length, reduced root diameters, reached maturity faster, had deeper root systems, and had a greater number of lateral roots. In contrast, polypropylene treatments had a mixed response, with high concentrations eliciting a lower root length, fewer laterals, and a more vertical root orientation. Segmented linear regression revealed that root growth in the Control and Biosolid treatments continued through the course of the experiment, while the microplastic treatments reached maturity up to two weeks earlier. Imagery revealed that microplastics elicited deeper rooting depth within the first week and differences in all root traits were evident by the development of the first trifoliate leaflets. Microplastic effects on root traits at early life stages suggest soil physiological drivers, while increased branching frequency and lower lateral elongation are suggestive of changes in soil nitrogen availability. The minimal difference in root traits in the biosolid treatment may be attributable to differences in microplastic properties or counteractive effects by other biosolid constituents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Pollution
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125141
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Root traits of soybeans exposed to polyethylene films, polypropylene fragments, and biosolids

Jill Crossman, Deqa Farow, Rebecca Lebel, Cameron Proctor
5 citations
Environmental Pollution
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.66
article

Root traits of soybeans exposed to polyethylene films, polypropylene fragments, and biosolids

Jill Crossman, Deqa Farow, Rebecca Lebel, Cameron Proctor
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Biosolid use imports microplastics into the rhizosphere where they may interfere with root-soil-microbial interactions and cause morphological adaptations in crop root systems. Few studies have examined the response of crop roots to microplastics at documented soil concentrations, and many studies collect root traits using destructive techniques. Hence, there is little information on when and how microplastics effect the physical structure of root systems. Using the rhizobox method, soybeans (Glycine max) were grown in soil amended with biosolid microplastic mimics (polyethylene film or polypropylene fragments at 2,000 and 15,000 particles/kg dry soil) or biosolids and imaged weekly until maturity (11 weeks) using a custom scanner system. Plant biomass increased in the polyethylene treatments and decreased in the high concentration polypropylene treatment. Relative to the Control, polyethylene treatments had larger root length, reduced root diameters, reached maturity faster, had deeper root systems, and had a greater number of lateral roots. In contrast, polypropylene treatments had a mixed response, with high concentrations eliciting a lower root length, fewer laterals, and a more vertical root orientation. Segmented linear regression revealed that root growth in the Control and Biosolid treatments continued through the course of the experiment, while the microplastic treatments reached maturity up to two weeks earlier. Imagery revealed that microplastics elicited deeper rooting depth within the first week and differences in all root traits were evident by the development of the first trifoliate leaflets. Microplastic effects on root traits at early life stages suggest soil physiological drivers, while increased branching frequency and lower lateral elongation are suggestive of changes in soil nitrogen availability. The minimal difference in root traits in the biosolid treatment may be attributable to differences in microplastic properties or counteractive effects by other biosolid constituents.

Environmental PollutionVol. 363(Pt 1)
University of Windsor (CA)
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.