Influence of land use intensity on urban carbon efficiency under a carbon neutrality target: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China

Urban carbon efficiency (UCE) is a critical measure for guiding cities in reducing carbon emissions while sustaining economic growth. Enhancing UCEs through efficient urban land use is considered a key strategy. However, while previous research has explored the impact of urban land use on carbon efficiency, the influence under the constraints of carbon neutrality targets remains underexamined. To fill this gap, we apply a super-efficiency slack-based measure (SBM) model combined with a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model to assess the heterogeneous effects of land use intensity on UCEs within the carbon neutrality framework. Additionally, we use a causal mediation effect model to identify the mediating factors. Using data from 2000 to 2019 for 41 prefecture-level cities in China's Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, we find the following: (1) A 1% decrease in land use intensity (urban land use per unit of GDP) leads to a 0.745% increase in UCE and a 0.227% increase in carbon neutrality potential (CNP) when carbon sequestration is included in the UCE calculation, both at a significance level of 1%. (2) The negative effects of land use intensity show significant heterogeneity across different city types. Specifically, it significantly impacts both UCE and CNP in cities with high economic levels and low ecological levels but significantly affects only UCE in other cities. (3) The urban population and built-up area amplify the influence of land use intensity on UCEs through mediating effects, whereas factors such as industrial structure, energy intensity, and foreign direct investment mitigate this influence. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating carbon sequestration in UCE assessments under carbon neutrality constraints. They also suggest that policy-makers should adopt differentiated urban land management strategies tailored to the socioeconomic and ecological conditions of different cities to enhance UCEs within urban agglomerations. • Urban land intensity contributes to both carbon efficiency and carbon neutrality. • High urban land use intensity considerably reduces urban carbon efficiency. • Improving urban carbon efficiency with carbon sequestration promotes carbon neutrality. • Scale, structure and technology effects are significant as the mediating effects. • Heterogeneous impacts exist among cities with different economic and ecological levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107689
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of land use intensity on urban carbon efficiency under a carbon neutrality target: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China

Jiayin Han, Zhiquan Qian, Gang Chen, Shengyang Zhong et al.
18 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
20.33
article

Influence of land use intensity on urban carbon efficiency under a carbon neutrality target: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China

Jiayin Han, Zhiquan Qian, Gang Chen, Shengyang Zhong, Xu Wu, Chenghe Wu
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Urban carbon efficiency (UCE) is a critical measure for guiding cities in reducing carbon emissions while sustaining economic growth. Enhancing UCEs through efficient urban land use is considered a key strategy. However, while previous research has explored the impact of urban land use on carbon efficiency, the influence under the constraints of carbon neutrality targets remains underexamined. To fill this gap, we apply a super-efficiency slack-based measure (SBM) model combined with a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model to assess the heterogeneous effects of land use intensity on UCEs within the carbon neutrality framework. Additionally, we use a causal mediation effect model to identify the mediating factors. Using data from 2000 to 2019 for 41 prefecture-level cities in China's Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, we find the following: (1) A 1% decrease in land use intensity (urban land use per unit of GDP) leads to a 0.745% increase in UCE and a 0.227% increase in carbon neutrality potential (CNP) when carbon sequestration is included in the UCE calculation, both at a significance level of 1%. (2) The negative effects of land use intensity show significant heterogeneity across different city types. Specifically, it significantly impacts both UCE and CNP in cities with high economic levels and low ecological levels but significantly affects only UCE in other cities. (3) The urban population and built-up area amplify the influence of land use intensity on UCEs through mediating effects, whereas factors such as industrial structure, energy intensity, and foreign direct investment mitigate this influence. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating carbon sequestration in UCE assessments under carbon neutrality constraints. They also suggest that policy-makers should adopt differentiated urban land management strategies tailored to the socioeconomic and ecological conditions of different cities to enhance UCEs within urban agglomerations. • Urban land intensity contributes to both carbon efficiency and carbon neutrality. • High urban land use intensity considerably reduces urban carbon efficiency. • Improving urban carbon efficiency with carbon sequestration promotes carbon neutrality. • Scale, structure and technology effects are significant as the mediating effects. • Heterogeneous impacts exist among cities with different economic and ecological levels.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 110
Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
20.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.