The challenge climate change poses to achieving resilient and inclusive rural transformation (RITI)

Responding to climate change presents deep challenges to achieving the resilient and inclusive rural transformation needed to eradicate global poverty. Exposure and vulnerability to climate hazards in areas of high rural poverty create an urgent need for adaptation. Poor rural areas and people experience higher limits to adaptation and thus higher costs in achieving effectiveness, as well as greater risk of incurring losses and damages where adaptation is insufficient. Mitigation measures in the agriculture , forestry and land use (AFOLU) sector could impose large, underestimated costs in the form of foregone opportunities for improved livelihoods. Past and current emission levels associated with wealth and opportunity are highly unequally distributed. The constrained additional carbon space to remain under 1.5 or 2 degrees of global warming mandates low emissions development pathways, requiring investments of trillions of dollars per year. Financing currently available is neither sufficient nor provided under the terms required to support a Just Transition . Overcoming these challenges requires building political will through explicit recognition and widespread communication of how climate change response can further disadvantage the poorest people in the global community. It requires revisiting distributional implications of methodologies for prioritizing mitigation options and devising approaches based on equity. Increasing the flow of financing under enabling conditions and integrating development and climate change is an urgent priority. A radical revamping of technical and policy approaches to climate change response and rural development strategies is needed to ensure their mutual reinforcement and prioritization of a resilient, inclusive approach to rural transformation. • Climate change raises vulnerability and costs for inclusive rural transformation. • Rural poor face high adaptation limits and vulnerability risks. • Vulnerability to climate hazards worsens by gender and poverty. • Mitigation in agriculture can impose high livelihood opportunity costs. • Trillions in financing are needed for low-emission development pathways and a just transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Food Security
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100811
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenge climate change poses to achieving resilient and inclusive rural transformation (RITI)

Leslie Lipper, Romina Cavatassi
18 citations
Global Food Security
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
8.26
article

The challenge climate change poses to achieving resilient and inclusive rural transformation (RITI)

Leslie Lipper, Romina Cavatassi
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Responding to climate change presents deep challenges to achieving the resilient and inclusive rural transformation needed to eradicate global poverty. Exposure and vulnerability to climate hazards in areas of high rural poverty create an urgent need for adaptation. Poor rural areas and people experience higher limits to adaptation and thus higher costs in achieving effectiveness, as well as greater risk of incurring losses and damages where adaptation is insufficient. Mitigation measures in the agriculture , forestry and land use (AFOLU) sector could impose large, underestimated costs in the form of foregone opportunities for improved livelihoods. Past and current emission levels associated with wealth and opportunity are highly unequally distributed. The constrained additional carbon space to remain under 1.5 or 2 degrees of global warming mandates low emissions development pathways, requiring investments of trillions of dollars per year. Financing currently available is neither sufficient nor provided under the terms required to support a Just Transition . Overcoming these challenges requires building political will through explicit recognition and widespread communication of how climate change response can further disadvantage the poorest people in the global community. It requires revisiting distributional implications of methodologies for prioritizing mitigation options and devising approaches based on equity. Increasing the flow of financing under enabling conditions and integrating development and climate change is an urgent priority. A radical revamping of technical and policy approaches to climate change response and rural development strategies is needed to ensure their mutual reinforcement and prioritization of a resilient, inclusive approach to rural transformation. • Climate change raises vulnerability and costs for inclusive rural transformation. • Rural poor face high adaptation limits and vulnerability risks. • Vulnerability to climate hazards worsens by gender and poverty. • Mitigation in agriculture can impose high livelihood opportunity costs. • Trillions in financing are needed for low-emission development pathways and a just transition.

Global Food SecurityVol. 43
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), World Bank Group (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
8.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.