Effects of Pirimiphos-Methyl on Non-Target Invertebrates

The effects of pirimiphos-methyl have previously been assessed on blood-sucking insect species, pollinating insects, and target crop pest species. The sensitivity of non-target zoophagous and saprophage species to this insecticide remains largely unstudied. In laboratory conditions, we assessed the susceptibility of 43 species of invertebrates to pirimiphos-methyl. The most tolerant species to this insecticide were <i>Pyrrhocoris apterus</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> measured over 60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), <i>Cylindroiulus truncorum</i>, <i>Pterostichus niger</i>, <i>Harpalus rufipes</i>, <i>Lithobius forficatus</i>, and <i>Carabus hortensis</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> ranged from 25 to 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). Average tolerance to pirimiphos-methyl was displayed by <i>Ophonus rufibarbis</i>, <i>Teuchestes fossor</i>, <i>Silpha carinata</i>, <i>Badister sodalis</i>, <i>Rugilus rufipes</i>, <i>Phosphuga atrata</i>, <i>Porcellio laevis</i>, <i>Pterostichus oblongopunctatus</i>, <i>Aphodius foetens</i>, <i>Lasius fuliginosus</i>, <i>Oxypselaphus obscurus</i>, <i>Platydracus fulvipes</i>, <i>Myrmica ruginodis</i>, <i>Xantholinus tricolor</i>, and <i>Megaphyllum</i> sp. (LC<sub>50</sub> for those species ranged from 12 to 24 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). Higher sensitivity to this insecticide was seen for <i>Amara nitida</i>, <i>Leistus ferrugineus</i>, <i>Harpalus xanthopus winkleri</i>, <i>Philonthus nitidus</i>, <i>Pterostichus melanarius</i>, <i>Harpalus latus</i>, <i>Limodromus assimilis</i>, <i>Philonthus decorus</i>, <i>Tachinus signatus</i>, <i>Ponera coarctata</i>, <i>Carabus convexus</i>, <i>Philonthus coprophilus</i>, <i>Philonthus laevicollis</i>, <i>Platydracus latebricola</i>, <i>Labia minor</i>, and <i>Carabus granulatus</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> for those species ranged from 6 to 12 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). The greatest sensitivity to pirimiphos-methyl was observed in <i>Hister fenestus</i>, <i>Drusilla canaliculata</i>, <i>Bisnius fimetarius</i>, <i>Oxytelus sculptus</i>, <i>Lasius niger</i>, and <i>Lasius flavus</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> ranged from 0.4 to 6 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). We found a relationship between the parameters of bodies of invertebrates (the average body length and dry body mass) and sensitivity to pirimiphos-methyl. With an increase in body sizes of invertebrates, the tolerance to the insecticide increased (per each mm of body length, LC<sub>50</sub> increased by 0.82 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on average). We identified no relationship between the trophic specialization and sensitivity to the insecticide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13100823
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Pirimiphos-Methyl on Non-Target Invertebrates

Л. И. Фалы, Viktor V. Brygadyrenko
5 citations
Biology
Insect and Pesticide Research
2.70
article

Effects of Pirimiphos-Methyl on Non-Target Invertebrates

Л. И. Фалы, Viktor V. Brygadyrenko
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The effects of pirimiphos-methyl have previously been assessed on blood-sucking insect species, pollinating insects, and target crop pest species. The sensitivity of non-target zoophagous and saprophage species to this insecticide remains largely unstudied. In laboratory conditions, we assessed the susceptibility of 43 species of invertebrates to pirimiphos-methyl. The most tolerant species to this insecticide were <i>Pyrrhocoris apterus</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> measured over 60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), <i>Cylindroiulus truncorum</i>, <i>Pterostichus niger</i>, <i>Harpalus rufipes</i>, <i>Lithobius forficatus</i>, and <i>Carabus hortensis</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> ranged from 25 to 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). Average tolerance to pirimiphos-methyl was displayed by <i>Ophonus rufibarbis</i>, <i>Teuchestes fossor</i>, <i>Silpha carinata</i>, <i>Badister sodalis</i>, <i>Rugilus rufipes</i>, <i>Phosphuga atrata</i>, <i>Porcellio laevis</i>, <i>Pterostichus oblongopunctatus</i>, <i>Aphodius foetens</i>, <i>Lasius fuliginosus</i>, <i>Oxypselaphus obscurus</i>, <i>Platydracus fulvipes</i>, <i>Myrmica ruginodis</i>, <i>Xantholinus tricolor</i>, and <i>Megaphyllum</i> sp. (LC<sub>50</sub> for those species ranged from 12 to 24 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). Higher sensitivity to this insecticide was seen for <i>Amara nitida</i>, <i>Leistus ferrugineus</i>, <i>Harpalus xanthopus winkleri</i>, <i>Philonthus nitidus</i>, <i>Pterostichus melanarius</i>, <i>Harpalus latus</i>, <i>Limodromus assimilis</i>, <i>Philonthus decorus</i>, <i>Tachinus signatus</i>, <i>Ponera coarctata</i>, <i>Carabus convexus</i>, <i>Philonthus coprophilus</i>, <i>Philonthus laevicollis</i>, <i>Platydracus latebricola</i>, <i>Labia minor</i>, and <i>Carabus granulatus</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> for those species ranged from 6 to 12 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). The greatest sensitivity to pirimiphos-methyl was observed in <i>Hister fenestus</i>, <i>Drusilla canaliculata</i>, <i>Bisnius fimetarius</i>, <i>Oxytelus sculptus</i>, <i>Lasius niger</i>, and <i>Lasius flavus</i> (LC<sub>50</sub> ranged from 0.4 to 6 mg/m<sup>2</sup>). We found a relationship between the parameters of bodies of invertebrates (the average body length and dry body mass) and sensitivity to pirimiphos-methyl. With an increase in body sizes of invertebrates, the tolerance to the insecticide increased (per each mm of body length, LC<sub>50</sub> increased by 0.82 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on average). We identified no relationship between the trophic specialization and sensitivity to the insecticide.

BiologyVol. 13(10)
Vytautas Magnus University (LT), Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University (UA), Oles Honchar Dnipro National University (UA)
European Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Insect and Pesticide Research
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.