Bridging or separating? Co-accessibility as a measure of potential place-based encounters

Accessibility is a widely used concept across various disciplines to evaluate the degree to which individuals can reach desired destinations. Conventionally, accessibility is determined by the attractiveness of a destination and the associated travel cost to reach it. However, existing place-based accessibility measures do not differentiate between destinations accessible to individuals from a single demographic group and those accessible to individuals from diverse demographic groups. We propose a measure to assess the potential of distinct destinations to bring different individuals and demographic groups together, defining this property as co-accessibility. We demonstrate how measuring co-accessibility can enhance existing accessibility measures, describe its components, and provide a mathematical formulation for quantifying it. To illustrate the practical application of our measure, we conduct a case study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, comparing the accessibility and co- accessibility of various destinations. This sample case study highlights the complexities and challenges inherent in measuring co-accessibility. Building on existing literature and our analysis results, we discuss the potential implications of co-accessibility, identify key challenges in its assessment, and recommend directions for future research. • Accessibility measures exhibit isolation and homogeneity biases. • Co-accessibility is proposed as a new measure of potential place-based encounters. • Co-accessibility can mitigate biases in accessibility measures. • A mathematical formulation of co-accessibility is presented. • The model can be applied to different travel modes and population groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport Geography
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104027
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging or separating? Co-accessibility as a measure of potential place-based encounters

Alessandro Bozzon, Vasileios Milias, Achilleas Psyllidis
3 citations
Journal of Transport Geography
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.05
article

Bridging or separating? Co-accessibility as a measure of potential place-based encounters

Alessandro Bozzon, Vasileios Milias, Achilleas Psyllidis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accessibility is a widely used concept across various disciplines to evaluate the degree to which individuals can reach desired destinations. Conventionally, accessibility is determined by the attractiveness of a destination and the associated travel cost to reach it. However, existing place-based accessibility measures do not differentiate between destinations accessible to individuals from a single demographic group and those accessible to individuals from diverse demographic groups. We propose a measure to assess the potential of distinct destinations to bring different individuals and demographic groups together, defining this property as co-accessibility. We demonstrate how measuring co-accessibility can enhance existing accessibility measures, describe its components, and provide a mathematical formulation for quantifying it. To illustrate the practical application of our measure, we conduct a case study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, comparing the accessibility and co- accessibility of various destinations. This sample case study highlights the complexities and challenges inherent in measuring co-accessibility. Building on existing literature and our analysis results, we discuss the potential implications of co-accessibility, identify key challenges in its assessment, and recommend directions for future research. • Accessibility measures exhibit isolation and homogeneity biases. • Co-accessibility is proposed as a new measure of potential place-based encounters. • Co-accessibility can mitigate biases in accessibility measures. • A mathematical formulation of co-accessibility is presented. • The model can be applied to different travel modes and population groups.

Journal of Transport GeographyVol. 121
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Horizon 2020
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.