Evaluation of the Gap Intercept Method to Measure Rangeland Connectivity

Characterizing the connectivity of materials, organisms, and energy on rangelands is critical to understanding and managing ecosystem response to disturbances. For over twenty years, scientists and rangeland managers have used the gap intercept method to monitor connectivity. However, using gap intercept measurements to infer ecosystem processes or inform management actions and conservation practices on rangelands has been limited because there are few tools and syntheses to help managers pragmatically interpret gap measurements. In this synthesis, we review the different ways the gap intercept method is conducted and highlight considerations when collecting and using gap intercept data. We discuss what is known about how gap intercept data can be used to assess wind and water erosion, biocrust abundance and composition, soil fertility, plant community dynamics, wildlife habitat characteristics, and fuel connectivity and fire behavior. Finally, we identify emerging opportunities regarding the collection and use of gap intercept data to assess rangeland connectivity, ecosystem function, and ecological processes. Through this synthesis we demonstrate the value of the gap intercept method, particularly “all-plant” (i.e., whole-community) canopy gap, in supporting assessments of rangeland condition and vulnerability, and in planning future management actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.09.001
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Gap Intercept Method to Measure Rangeland Connectivity

Aleta Nafus, Matthew J. Germino, Joseph R. Brehm, Brian K. Howard et al.
9 citations
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
4.13
article

Evaluation of the Gap Intercept Method to Measure Rangeland Connectivity

Aleta Nafus, Matthew J. Germino, Joseph R. Brehm, Brian K. Howard, Peter J. Olsoy, Jason W. Karl, A Russell Schaefer, Lea A. Condon, Nicole Pietrasiak, David S. Pilliod, Anna C. Knight, Beth A. Newingham, Emily Kachergis, Nicholas P. Webb, Brandi Wheeler, Jeffrey E. Herrick, Sarah E. McCord, Kristina E. Young, Lisa M. Ellsworth, C. Jason Williams, Savannah Meadors, Leah T. Dreesmann
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Characterizing the connectivity of materials, organisms, and energy on rangelands is critical to understanding and managing ecosystem response to disturbances. For over twenty years, scientists and rangeland managers have used the gap intercept method to monitor connectivity. However, using gap intercept measurements to infer ecosystem processes or inform management actions and conservation practices on rangelands has been limited because there are few tools and syntheses to help managers pragmatically interpret gap measurements. In this synthesis, we review the different ways the gap intercept method is conducted and highlight considerations when collecting and using gap intercept data. We discuss what is known about how gap intercept data can be used to assess wind and water erosion, biocrust abundance and composition, soil fertility, plant community dynamics, wildlife habitat characteristics, and fuel connectivity and fire behavior. Finally, we identify emerging opportunities regarding the collection and use of gap intercept data to assess rangeland connectivity, ecosystem function, and ecological processes. Through this synthesis we demonstrate the value of the gap intercept method, particularly “all-plant” (i.e., whole-community) canopy gap, in supporting assessments of rangeland condition and vulnerability, and in planning future management actions.

Rangeland Ecology & ManagementVol. 98
New Mexico State University (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Bureau of Land Management (US), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Agricultural Research Service (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Idaho (US), Denver Federal Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
4.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.