As good as it gets? A new approach to estimating possible prediction performance

How much information does a dataset contain about an outcome of interest? To answer this question, estimates are generated for a given dataset, representing the minimum possible absolute prediction error for an outcome variable that any model could achieve. The estimate is produced using a constrained omniscient model that mandates only that identical observations receive identical predictions, and that observations which are very similar to each other receive predictions that are alike. It is demonstrated that the resulting prediction accuracy bounds function effectively on both simulated data and real-world datasets. This method generates bounds on predictive performance typically within 10% of the performance of the true model, and performs well across a range of simulated and real datasets. Three applications of the methodology are discussed: measuring data quality, model evaluation, and quantifying the amount of irreducible error in a prediction problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296904
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

As good as it gets? A new approach to estimating possible prediction performance

David R. Anderson, Margrét Bjarnadóttir
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Data Quality and Management
0.98
article

As good as it gets? A new approach to estimating possible prediction performance

David R. Anderson, Margrét Bjarnadóttir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How much information does a dataset contain about an outcome of interest? To answer this question, estimates are generated for a given dataset, representing the minimum possible absolute prediction error for an outcome variable that any model could achieve. The estimate is produced using a constrained omniscient model that mandates only that identical observations receive identical predictions, and that observations which are very similar to each other receive predictions that are alike. It is demonstrated that the resulting prediction accuracy bounds function effectively on both simulated data and real-world datasets. This method generates bounds on predictive performance typically within 10% of the performance of the true model, and performs well across a range of simulated and real datasets. Three applications of the methodology are discussed: measuring data quality, model evaluation, and quantifying the amount of irreducible error in a prediction problem.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(10)
University of Maryland, College Park (US), Villanova University (US)
Villanova University
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Data Quality and Management
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.