Are Client Importance and Auditor Expertise Associated with How Material Misstatement Corrections Are Disclosed?

SUMMARY Management is often motivated to correct misstatements discreetly. Using misstatement corrections disclosed in annual reports from 2007 through 2020, I find that important clients are less likely to disclose material misstatements correctly and that auditor specialization does not seem to impact whether material misstatements are disclosed correctly. Additionally, I find that important clients disclose material misstatement corrections more discreetly when misstatements are negative, when the audit office recently lost clients, when audit market competition is high, and when the restatement auditor is the same as the misstatement period auditor. For immaterial misstatements, client importance is not associated with disclosure accuracy, but specialist auditors increase accuracy. These findings suggest that auditors may allow more discreet misstatement corrections when pressured by important clients. Moreover, specialist auditors exhibit higher quality only when correcting immaterial misstatements. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M48.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2022-039
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Client Importance and Auditor Expertise Associated with How Material Misstatement Corrections Are Disclosed?

Chenxi Lin
1 links
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Are Client Importance and Auditor Expertise Associated with How Material Misstatement Corrections Are Disclosed?

Chenxi Lin
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY Management is often motivated to correct misstatements discreetly. Using misstatement corrections disclosed in annual reports from 2007 through 2020, I find that important clients are less likely to disclose material misstatements correctly and that auditor specialization does not seem to impact whether material misstatements are disclosed correctly. Additionally, I find that important clients disclose material misstatement corrections more discreetly when misstatements are negative, when the audit office recently lost clients, when audit market competition is high, and when the restatement auditor is the same as the misstatement period auditor. For immaterial misstatements, client importance is not associated with disclosure accuracy, but specialist auditors increase accuracy. These findings suggest that auditors may allow more discreet misstatement corrections when pressured by important clients. Moreover, specialist auditors exhibit higher quality only when correcting immaterial misstatements. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M48.

Auditing A Journal of Practice & TheoryVol. 44(3)
University of Oklahoma (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.