Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Skin Cancer Classification

The diagnosis of skin cancer is a serious health problem worldwide. Early diagnosis improves the quality of life and survival of patients. Accurate diagnosis is challenging and requires expertise due to the diversity and similarity of skin lesions. Deep learning techniques are frequently recommended in the literature to solve these challenges and to achieve robust results in the diagnosis process. In this study, the comparative potential of different deep learning models for the classification of skin cancer types is investigated. Within the scope of the study, training and testing processes were performed with ISIC Skin Cancer Image Dataset and six variations of EfficientNet and MobileNet. Six different deep learning models were evaluated: EfficientNetB0, EfficientNet-B1, EfficientNet-B2, MobileNet-V2, MobileNet-V3-Small and MobileNet-V3-Large. As a result of the test processes within the scope of the study, achieving accuracy scores of $86.91 \%, 87.35 \%, 87.50 \%, 85.59 \%, 86.76 \%$, and 89.41%, respectively. In the comparison between EfficientNet and MobileNet models and six variations, MobileNet-V3-Large model was found to be first in classifying skin cancer with 90.59% Recall and 89.53% F1 score. It is predicted that the systems to be developed with the MobileNet-V3-Large model will decrease the diagnosis time of physicians and increase the rate of successful diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/idap64064.2024.10710839
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Skin Cancer Classification

Mehmet Süleyman Yıldırım, Yeşim Şahin
4 citations
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
1.13
article

Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Skin Cancer Classification

Mehmet Süleyman Yıldırım, Yeşim Şahin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The diagnosis of skin cancer is a serious health problem worldwide. Early diagnosis improves the quality of life and survival of patients. Accurate diagnosis is challenging and requires expertise due to the diversity and similarity of skin lesions. Deep learning techniques are frequently recommended in the literature to solve these challenges and to achieve robust results in the diagnosis process. In this study, the comparative potential of different deep learning models for the classification of skin cancer types is investigated. Within the scope of the study, training and testing processes were performed with ISIC Skin Cancer Image Dataset and six variations of EfficientNet and MobileNet. Six different deep learning models were evaluated: EfficientNetB0, EfficientNet-B1, EfficientNet-B2, MobileNet-V2, MobileNet-V3-Small and MobileNet-V3-Large. As a result of the test processes within the scope of the study, achieving accuracy scores of $86.91 \%, 87.35 \%, 87.50 \%, 85.59 \%, 86.76 \%$, and 89.41%, respectively. In the comparison between EfficientNet and MobileNet models and six variations, MobileNet-V3-Large model was found to be first in classifying skin cancer with 90.59% Recall and 89.53% F1 score. It is predicted that the systems to be developed with the MobileNet-V3-Large model will decrease the diagnosis time of physicians and increase the rate of successful diagnosis.

Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.