Comparison of Activation Functions in the KarcıFANN Method

The lack of a certain standard in modeling Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) sometimes provides successful results while sometimes it causes unsuccessful results depending on the changes in the selected hyper parameters. The optimization method is a hyper parameter that significantly affects the performance of ANNs. If the learning coefficient parameter used in the SGD optimization method, which is a fixed number, is chosen too small, the solution takes a long time; if it is chosen too large, it causes problems such as getting stuck in local minima and moving away from the solution. In the Karcı Fractional Neural Network (KarcıFANN) method proposed in this article, the learning of the network is performed by using the fractional derivative instead of the learning coefficient parameter. Thanks to the KarcıFANN method, the weights are updated with a fractional derivative that changes according to the value of the error function obtained at each iteration and external intervention to the network is minimized. Activation function is another hyperparameter that affects the performance of ANNs. Activation function determines whether the output value of a neuron will be produced or not, that is, whether the neuron will be active or not. In this study, Gina_Prior2 data set was classified using KarcıFANN method using sigmoid, hyperbolic tangent (tanh) and hyperbolic tangent sigmoid (tansig) activation functions and the effects of these activation functions on performance were compared. As a result of the experiments performed on the designed model, it was seen that the most successful activation function was the sigmoid function, which produced accuracy values over 99%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/idap64064.2024.10711149
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Activation Functions in the KarcıFANN Method

Ali Karcı, Meral Karakurt, Hülya Saygılı
3 citations
Neural Networks and Applications
1.04
article

Comparison of Activation Functions in the KarcıFANN Method

Ali Karcı, Meral Karakurt, Hülya Saygılı
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The lack of a certain standard in modeling Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) sometimes provides successful results while sometimes it causes unsuccessful results depending on the changes in the selected hyper parameters. The optimization method is a hyper parameter that significantly affects the performance of ANNs. If the learning coefficient parameter used in the SGD optimization method, which is a fixed number, is chosen too small, the solution takes a long time; if it is chosen too large, it causes problems such as getting stuck in local minima and moving away from the solution. In the Karcı Fractional Neural Network (KarcıFANN) method proposed in this article, the learning of the network is performed by using the fractional derivative instead of the learning coefficient parameter. Thanks to the KarcıFANN method, the weights are updated with a fractional derivative that changes according to the value of the error function obtained at each iteration and external intervention to the network is minimized. Activation function is another hyperparameter that affects the performance of ANNs. Activation function determines whether the output value of a neuron will be produced or not, that is, whether the neuron will be active or not. In this study, Gina_Prior2 data set was classified using KarcıFANN method using sigmoid, hyperbolic tangent (tanh) and hyperbolic tangent sigmoid (tansig) activation functions and the effects of these activation functions on performance were compared. As a result of the experiments performed on the designed model, it was seen that the most successful activation function was the sigmoid function, which produced accuracy values over 99%.

Osmaniye Korkut Ata University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Neural Networks and Applications
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.